I have found around 12000 such number pairs were this bug occurs. Here
is a link to my blog where I have posted a few thousand.
http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...rence-of-excel...
[blogspot.com]

Here is the ruby code to get a list of these
numbers(however seems my pattern is not completely correct as only
12000 of the 72000 of these number pairs are actually reproducing the
bug) http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...ing-vista.html
[blogspot.com]

On Sep 28, 5:29 pm, pr <piyush...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have found around 12000 such number pairs were this bug occurs. Here
> is a link to my blog where I have posted a few thousand.http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...rence-of-excel...
> [blogspot.com]
>
> Here is the ruby code to get a list of these
> numbers(however seems my pattern is not completely correct as only
> 12000 of the 72000 of these number pairs are actually reproducing the
> bug)http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...ing-vista.html
> [blogspot.com]

By "this bug" I mean excel multiplication bug

You certainly know how to waste your time. You should read the posts in this
newsgroup.

Your calculations are just resulting in one of the 12 values that are not
being displayed properly as MS has acknowledged:
http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/...ue-update.aspx

You're flogging a dead horse.


"pr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) ps.com...
>I have found around 12000 such number pairs were this bug occurs. Here
> is a link to my blog where I have posted a few thousand.
> http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...rence-of-excel...
> [blogspot.com]
>
> Here is the ruby code to get a list of these
> numbers(however seems my pattern is not completely correct as only
> 12000 of the 72000 of these number pairs are actually reproducing the
> bug)
> http://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/09/...ing-vista.html
> [blogspot.com]
>