S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " said:why do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
I miss a lot by using the Block Sender option in my newsreader.
" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i l.com>
wrote:why do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit uponNote that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is not
an employee
of Microsoft.Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Aaron Kempf said:DAO and JET haven't been included with Office,
MDAC or Windows for the past decade
Wayne-I-M said:Hi Aaron
I have read your posts quite a lot and you may be right or not. Either way
it doesn't matter. My one question is have you ever thought to yourself "why
I am I posting these messages, as it's not important whether the whole world
agrees with me".
I make a living writing access db's and then looking after them. I know
there are other db's available and I can use / create / administer / etc
quite a few of them "but" some of the people I work for want an access db so
that is what I make.
If you don't like them so much why not simply accept there are other points
of view and get on with your own "stuff". The fact that others use a
particular programme to create db's does not "in anyway" affect you
personally.
Maybe it's time to move on and upwards. There are other things in life to
worry about and it's much too short to worry if everyone agrees with your
choice of db construction.
You are going to be dead for a very long time. Relax and enjoy life while
you have it - smile and have fun.
--
Wayne
Manchester, England.
Aaron Kempf said:I speak the truth Tony
DAO and JET haven't been included with Office, MDAC or Windows for the past
decade
stick a cork in it.
I'm not going to let you spread lies another day
Access Data Projects makes all your 'Linked Table Crap' go away
Maybe if the obsolete database, and Access Library that you refer to-- maybe
if those could stand up in a serious technical comparison-- then maybe you'd
have a leg to stand on
I will not allow you kids to further this DAO crap
DAO is a walking memory leak.
If your library makes your clean up variables?
THEN YOU NEED A NEW DARN LIBRARY
do the math
Memory Leak; and a pain in the butt?
or
Simple, Fast Data Access Library.
I can do anything that you can do in MDB-- in a single line of code
Change a passthru query in order to run a sproc with parameters? SINGLE LINE
OF SQL
Change the definition for a query?
ALTER PROCEDURE, ALTER VIEW
time to lose the training wheels, kids
l.com>Tony Toews said:" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i
wrote:notwhy do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
Note that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is
an employeeof Microsoft.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Wayne-I-M said:Hi Aaron
I have read your posts quite a lot and you may be right or not. Either way
it doesn't matter. My one question is have you ever thought to yourself "why
I am I posting these messages, as it's not important whether the whole world
agrees with me".
I make a living writing access db's and then looking after them. I know
there are other db's available and I can use / create / administer / etc
quite a few of them "but" some of the people I work for want an access db so
that is what I make.
If you don't like them so much why not simply accept there are other points
of view and get on with your own "stuff". The fact that others use a
particular programme to create db's does not "in anyway" affect you
personally.
Maybe it's time to move on and upwards. There are other things in life to
worry about and it's much too short to worry if everyone agrees with your
choice of db construction.
You are going to be dead for a very long time. Relax and enjoy life while
you have it - smile and have fun.
--
Wayne
Manchester, England.
Aaron Kempf said:I speak the truth Tony
DAO and JET haven't been included with Office, MDAC or Windows for the past
decade
stick a cork in it.
I'm not going to let you spread lies another day
Access Data Projects makes all your 'Linked Table Crap' go away
Maybe if the obsolete database, and Access Library that you refer to-- maybe
if those could stand up in a serious technical comparison-- then maybe you'd
have a leg to stand on
I will not allow you kids to further this DAO crap
DAO is a walking memory leak.
If your library makes your clean up variables?
THEN YOU NEED A NEW DARN LIBRARY
do the math
Memory Leak; and a pain in the butt?
or
Simple, Fast Data Access Library.
I can do anything that you can do in MDB-- in a single line of code
Change a passthru query in order to run a sproc with parameters? SINGLE LINE
OF SQL
Change the definition for a query?
ALTER PROCEDURE, ALTER VIEW
time to lose the training wheels, kids
l.com>Tony Toews said:" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i
wrote:notwhy do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
Note that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is
an employeeof Microsoft.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Aaron Kempf said:you just lost me kid
when you said 'Access Databases'
Access is not a database
Access is a frontend to SQL Server data
it's not time to move on and upwards.
It's time for jihad
Nobody that you work for WANTS to have an Access Database.
You just don't know how to write SQL Server, kid
Wayne-I-M said:Hi Aaron
I have read your posts quite a lot and you may be right or not. Either way
it doesn't matter. My one question is have you ever thought to yourself "why
I am I posting these messages, as it's not important whether the whole world
agrees with me".
I make a living writing access db's and then looking after them. I know
there are other db's available and I can use / create / administer / etc
quite a few of them "but" some of the people I work for want an access db so
that is what I make.
If you don't like them so much why not simply accept there are other points
of view and get on with your own "stuff". The fact that others use a
particular programme to create db's does not "in anyway" affect you
personally.
Maybe it's time to move on and upwards. There are other things in life
to
worry about and it's much too short to worry if everyone agrees with your
choice of db construction.
You are going to be dead for a very long time. Relax and enjoy life
while
you have it - smile and have fun.
--
Wayne
Manchester, England.
Aaron Kempf said:I speak the truth Tony
DAO and JET haven't been included with Office, MDAC or Windows for the past
decade
stick a cork in it.
I'm not going to let you spread lies another day
Access Data Projects makes all your 'Linked Table Crap' go away
Maybe if the obsolete database, and Access Library that you refer to-- maybe
if those could stand up in a serious technical comparison-- then maybe you'd
have a leg to stand on
I will not allow you kids to further this DAO crap
DAO is a walking memory leak.
If your library makes your clean up variables?
THEN YOU NEED A NEW DARN LIBRARY
do the math
Memory Leak; and a pain in the butt?
or
Simple, Fast Data Access Library.
I can do anything that you can do in MDB-- in a single line of code
Change a passthru query in order to run a sproc with parameters? SINGLE LINE
OF SQL
Change the definition for a query?
ALTER PROCEDURE, ALTER VIEW
time to lose the training wheels, kids
" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i l.com>
wrote:
why do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
Note that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is not
an employee
of Microsoft.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Aaron Kempf said:FACTS ARE NOT WRONG BY DEFINITION
MDB has been obsolete for a decade
decade.DAO and Jet hasn't been included with Office, Widnows or MDAC for a
IS THERE A NEW VERSION OF DAO IN VISTA? THERE
SURE IS A NEW VERSION OF ADO!
Larry Linson said:You are posting erroneous information. Repeating false claims does not make
them true.
Enhancements to MDB have been included in every single release of Access,
including the new Access 2007, along with the new MDB- and Jet-descendent
database formats.
decade.
That is simply incorrect. DAO and Jet have been included with Office and
Windows, including the current releases.
Vista-compatible libraries for both DAO and ADO exist.
Sorry, Mr. Kempf -- your facts are in error.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
Huh! Turns out you weren't on the Blocked Senders list after all. Well,
it's sort of amusing for now.
Why not just do what you want to do? Why stomp around in this newsgroup?
Do you imagine that by calling people "kid" and engaging in other rude and
condescending behavior that you will win them over to your position? The
weird part is that you seem to care what product other people use.
Jet is the database engine that ships with Access. SQL server can be used
as the engine too, as I understand it. Access is the programming
environment in which an interface with the database engine is designed and
implemented.
you just lost me kidwhen you said 'Access Databases'Access is not a databaseAccess is a frontend to SQL Server datait's not time to move on and upwards.
It's time for jihadNobody that you work for WANTS to have an Access Database.
You just don't know how to write SQL Server, kidWayne-I-M said:Hi Aaron
I have read your posts quite a lot and you may be right or not. Either way
it doesn't matter. My one question is have you ever thought to yourself "why
I am I posting these messages, as it's not important whether the whole world
agrees with me".
I make a living writing access db's and then looking after them. I know
there are other db's available and I can use / create / administer / etc
quite a few of them "but" some of the people I work for want an access db so
that is what I make.
If you don't like them so much why not simply accept there are other points
of view and get on with your own "stuff". The fact that others use a
particular programme to create db's does not "in anyway" affect you
personally.
Maybe it's time to move on and upwards. There are other things in life
to
worry about and it's much too short to worry if everyone agrees with your
choice of db construction.
You are going to be dead for a very long time. Relax and enjoy life
while
you have it - smile and have fun.
--
Wayne
Manchester, England.
:
I speak the truth Tony
DAO and JET haven't been included with Office, MDAC or Windows for the past
decade
stick a cork in it.
I'm not going to let you spread lies another day
Access Data Projects makes all your 'Linked Table Crap' go away
Maybe if the obsolete database, and Access Library that you refer to-- maybe
if those could stand up in a serious technical comparison-- then maybe you'd
have a leg to stand on
I will not allow you kids to further this DAO crap
DAO is a walking memory leak.
If your library makes your clean up variables?
THEN YOU NEED A NEW DARN LIBRARY
do the math
Memory Leak; and a pain in the butt?
or
Simple, Fast Data Access Library.
I can do anything that you can do in MDB-- in a single line of code
Change a passthru query in order to run a sproc with parameters? SINGLE LINE
OF SQL
Change the definition for a query?
ALTER PROCEDURE, ALTER VIEW
time to lose the training wheels, kids
" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i l.com>
wrote:
why do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
Note that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is not
an employee
of Microsoft.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hi Aaron
I have read your posts quite a lot and you may be right or not. Either way
it doesn't matter. My one question is have you ever thought to yourself "why
I am I posting these messages, as it's not important whether the whole world
agrees with me".
I make a living writing access db's and then looking after them. I know
there are other db's available and I can use / create / administer / etc
quite a few of them "but" some of the people I work for want an access db so
that is what I make.
If you don't like them so much why not simply accept there are other points
of view and get on with your own "stuff". The fact that others use a
particular programme to create db's does not "in anyway" affect you
personally.
Maybe it's time to move on and upwards. There are other things in life to
worry about and it's much too short to worry if everyone agrees with your
choice of db construction.
You are going to be dead for a very long time. Relax and enjoy life while
you have it - smile and have fun.
--
Wayne
Manchester, England.
Aaron Kempf said:I speak the truth TonyDAO and JET haven't been included with Office, MDAC or Windows for the past
decadestick a cork in it.
I'm not going to let you spread lies another dayAccess Data Projects makes all your 'Linked Table Crap' go away
Maybe if the obsolete database, and Access Library that you refer to-- maybe
if those could stand up in a serious technical comparison-- then maybe you'd
have a leg to stand onI will not allow you kids to further this DAO crapDAO is a walking memory leak.
If your library makes your clean up variables?THEN YOU NEED A NEW DARN LIBRARYdo the mathMemory Leak; and a pain in the butt?
Simple, Fast Data Access Library.I can do anything that you can do in MDB-- in a single line of codeChange a passthru query in order to run a sproc with parameters? SINGLE LINE
OF SQLChange the definition for a query?
ALTER PROCEDURE, ALTER VIEWtime to lose the training wheels, kidsTony Toews said:" S u s i e D B A [ M S FT ] " <s u s i e d b a @h o t m a i l.com> wrote:why do you diptards still use DAO again?
why would you want to have 2 different DIALECTS of SQL?
Anyone using MDB or DAO should be fired and then spit upon
Note that this person is really A a r o n K e m p f and that he is not an employee
of Microsoft.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -