A97 bug: database corruption

[Vladimír Cvajniga]

After non-specified user's activity we've got "Record(s) can't be read; no
read permissions on 'MsysModules2'" error. I went to MS KB,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170696 ... but the database I'm talking
about was not secured.

User has a backup copy of the database but I'd like to know if there's any
chance to restore the data from the corrupted database.

TIA

Vlado

 

[Larry Linson]

After non-specified user's activity we've got "Record(s)
can't be read; no read permissions on 'MsysModules2'"
error. I went to MS KB, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170696 ...
but the database I'm talking about was not secured.

User has a backup copy of the database but I'd like to
know if there's any chance to restore the data from
the corrupted database.

Did you try Repair and Compact? In the database window, Tools | Database
Utilities | Compact and Repair.

If that doesn't work, use Google Groups to search this newsgroup's archive
and the archive of the USENET newsgroup comp.databases.ms-access for
"jetcomp".

For good information on preventing corruption, visit MVP Tony Toews' site
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm.

Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP

 

[Vladimír Cvajniga]

TYVM for your respond, Larry.

1) Repair and Compact cannot be executed since I can't open the database.
2) Jetcomp.exe (with various settings): Error compacting database.

:-(

Vlado

 

[David W. Fenton]

If that doesn't work, use Google Groups to search this newsgroup's
archive and the archive of the USENET newsgroup
comp.databases.ms-access for "jetcomp".

Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
search support.microsoft.com?

 

[David W. Fenton]

TYVM for your respond, Larry.

1) Repair and Compact cannot be executed since I can't open the
database. 2) Jetcomp.exe (with various settings): Error compacting
database.

http://pksolutions.com

Peter Miller is very good at recovering data and doesn't charge
anything if he can't recover it.

 

[John W. Vinson]

Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
search support.microsoft.com?

If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be the case.
Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to search for newsgroup
posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their bosses).

John W. Vinson [MVP]

 

[Larry Linson]

If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine,
that would be the case. Even a lot of Microsoft
employees use Google Groups to search for newsgroup
posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their bosses).

What he said!

But, David, you're probably correct -- there's a good chance that jetcomp
has been moved around the Microsoft site several times since some of those
posts linked to it.

Larry

 

[David W. Fenton]

If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be
the case. Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to
search for newsgroup posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their
bosses).

I've never found the advanced search problematic.

I use google.com/microsoft.html for microsoft-specific searches, but
it returns results from more than just microsoft.com sites.

 

[David W. Fenton]

If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be
the case. Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to
search for newsgroup posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their
bosses).

I missed that you said Google Groups. Why would someone search
Google Groups for this? Why not just use Google to search the web if
you don't like the search engine for support.microsoft.com (which
I've never had any problems using).