dont want to disclose email address.

[phoenix]

Is there any other way not disclose email addresses without using the bcc
feature?

 

[mattridings]

Is there any other way not disclose email addresses without using the bcc
feature?

The answer is basically 'no' as alternative means could all be
detected via the email header.

What's wrong with BCC?

-matt

 

[John Blessing]

Look into mail merge in the Outlook help or please try our email scheduler
(http://www.lbetoolbox.com/scheduleemail.htm) which will allow you to send
multiple individual emails, html or plain text, with attachments, either as
a one-off or regularly at a specified time and interval

--
John Blessing

http://www.LbeHelpdesk.com - Help Desk software priced to suit all
businesses
http://www.room-booking-software.com - Schedule rooms & equipment bookings
for your meeting/class over the web.
http://www.lbetoolbox.com - Remove Duplicates from MS Outlook, find/replace,
send newsletters

 

[phoenix]

What kind of alternative means are we talking about, if you dont mind me
asking?

 

[mattridings]

There are means of 'disguising' recipient addresses by trying to trick
the email client, but the problem with that is that it will only work
on certain email clients and the bigger issue is that doing so would
cause a great many spam filters to detect your email as spam, and in
certain cases a mail server could reject it altogether. So it's just
a bad idea all the way around.

BCC is a working solution for most casual users, and for the rest
sending individual copies of each email to each recipient is the
solution. I can't imagine there will be an answer that doesn't
involve one of those two options but if you care to explain exactly
what you're trying to accomplish we could examine it from that
perspective.

-matt

 

[phoenix]

Thanks, Matt. I didnt know the spam filters would be a problem. Thanks for
following up with me. It is greatly appreciated. Have a good week!

~phoenix