R
Randall Arnold
Wait-a-minute Ed-- you're 16?????!!!????
At least, that's what I get from your website.
Okay, that explains a lot! And I'm not discrediting your opinions and
experience solely on basis of a number, mind you, but I'm guessing (just
guessing) you haven't spent a lot of time in corporate America (your
location also playing a part in that).
Here's where I'm coming from, in a nutshell: the scenarios, needs, wants,
rants, raves and nitpicks I've bounced off you are all borne of frustrating
experiences using Office products in a corporate workflow. With all due
respect, one would really have to had traipsed a mile in my moccasins to
grasp where I'm coming from, especially regarding expectations of Publisher.
I understand now some of your comments regarding intended purpose and scope
of MS products (especially when contratsed against my own contentions), but
I feel I must also inform you that things are just a wee bit different in
the Real World... and it's experienced input and feedback like mine that
drives product development and improvement. Just knowing a product inside
and out per se isn't always enough: one must also know not only how it's
expected to be used by the developer but also how users expect the product
to function in the wild.
I now have a greater context with which to frame discussion with you, and
can avoid some serious contextual faux pas in the future. But that doesn't
mean I'm gonna dumb anything down for ya, though-- kid.
; )
Randall Arnold
Jurassic Age Tech Weenie
At least, that's what I get from your website.
Okay, that explains a lot! And I'm not discrediting your opinions and
experience solely on basis of a number, mind you, but I'm guessing (just
guessing) you haven't spent a lot of time in corporate America (your
location also playing a part in that).
Here's where I'm coming from, in a nutshell: the scenarios, needs, wants,
rants, raves and nitpicks I've bounced off you are all borne of frustrating
experiences using Office products in a corporate workflow. With all due
respect, one would really have to had traipsed a mile in my moccasins to
grasp where I'm coming from, especially regarding expectations of Publisher.
I understand now some of your comments regarding intended purpose and scope
of MS products (especially when contratsed against my own contentions), but
I feel I must also inform you that things are just a wee bit different in
the Real World... and it's experienced input and feedback like mine that
drives product development and improvement. Just knowing a product inside
and out per se isn't always enough: one must also know not only how it's
expected to be used by the developer but also how users expect the product
to function in the wild.
I now have a greater context with which to frame discussion with you, and
can avoid some serious contextual faux pas in the future. But that doesn't
mean I'm gonna dumb anything down for ya, though-- kid.
; )
Randall Arnold
Jurassic Age Tech Weenie