Entourage 2004 with Exchange 2004 Slow to deliver mail

D

David I Blaymires

Has anyone else noticed that Entourage 2004 takes a long time to receive
emails? An email in Entourage X will come through almost instantaneously,
while on Entourage 2004 it can take up to 5 minutes.

Also, we are finding that Entourage 2004 is INCREDIBLY slow at synchronising
to the Exchange server (2000 in our situation). We know we are not
imagining this. Is anyone else seeing this? Its driving us NUTS!

The other mail clients, Mac and Windows, are as fast as always.
 
A

aRKay

After reading comments like the following I have been dragging my feet
on upgrading from ENT-X to ENT-2004 on a G4-450 (AGP) machine. It is
running 10.3.5 but something tells me it may lack the hp to handle the
new Entourage 2004.

David I Blaymires said:
Has anyone else noticed that Entourage 2004 takes a long time to receive
emails? An email in Entourage X will come through almost instantaneously,
while on Entourage 2004 it can take up to 5 minute

How about some success stories with ENT-2004 on older machines. From
what I have read it looks like a big mistake and a time/money waster.
 
D

David Blaymires

After reading comments like the following I have been dragging my feet
on upgrading from ENT-X to ENT-2004 on a G4-450 (AGP) machine. It is
running 10.3.5 but something tells me it may lack the hp to handle the
new Entourage 2004.



How about some success stories with ENT-2004 on older machines. From
what I have read it looks like a big mistake and a time/money waster.

Seeing as I wrote what you quoted, perhaps its appropriate that I provide
you with a success story. We have been running Entourage 2004 on a G3
PowerBook with only 320MB RAM. In addition we have also been running
Classic. Entourage 2004 has been working well, in a cramped environment.
Note: I would not recommend doing this though, as you need at least 500MB
RAM for OS X and the more memory the better. Its been great on a PB 1GHz
500MB RAM.

Things I really like:
€ It upgraded quickly, easily and it didn't require me to do anything more
than install 2004 and uninstall X.
€ I haven't had one instance of the dreaded beachball! Previously we would
get that very frequently and have hundreds if not thousands of duplicated
events, contacts etc.
€ I like projects - very useful.
€ I think it is a much nicer, though not too different interface.
€ I LOVE the fact that when the Exchange Server is not available,
Send/Receive does not try to talk to the bl**dy server all the time!!!
€ I like the new non-html standard font.
€ I think this version of the Junk Mail filter is great! Almost all the
junk is handled, and all the rubbish can be deleted easily.
€ The views in the mail window are AWESOME. SO many ways to find, group and
view things!
€ The scrapbook is an intriguing aspect that I have only just discovered.
€ Neat keyboard shortcuts!!!

Things I'm not so impressed with:
€ Emails with punctuation type characters !#$%^&* not being delivered when
sent from within the Exchange environment.
€ Speed of receiving emails from the Exchange Server - note: speed of
receiving emails from outside exchange (.Mac for example) is great. Its
just the speed of synchronising...!
€ Notes & tasks don't synchronise to Exchange...
€ We can't get delegates to work, and that's a big reason why we went to
2004. Perhaps we've configured something incorrectly, but I could swear we
have done the right thing...
€ Not full support for Exchange public folders...
€ No delegation of tasks (only through sharing projects, and it doesn't
appear that sharing applies to Windows users... I'm happy to be proved
wrong.)

In summary, I much prefer Entourage 2004 to Entourage X - heaps more stable,
it works really well. I guess that you must decide based on your own
situation, but for me its been worth it.
 
S

Sam Elowitch

For what it's worth, I'm writing this using Entourage 2004 on a 450Mhz AGP
PowerMac G4 with 896MB of RAM (OS X 10.2.8) and it works great. I think
plenty of RAM definitely helps.

-Sam
 
A

aRKay

aRKay said:
How about some success stories with ENT-2004 on older machines. From
what I have read it looks like a big mistake and a time/money waster.

Thanks to both David and Sam for the excellent responses. Nice to see
something nice said about Entourage 2004 rather than talking about the
warts. Getting 2004 just move up on my want list.

aRKay
 
A

aRKay

David,

Thank you for taking the time to say something nice about Entourage
2004. Your comments are appreciated.

aRKay
 
S

Sverre Johan Tøvik

David Blaymires said:
• We can't get delegates to work, and that's a big reason why we went to
2004. Perhaps we've configured something incorrectly, but I could swear we
have done the right thing...

I may be off here, but I think it might require the same as viewing
another persons calendar with OWA. In adittion to giving people access
to the calendar folder, you also have to give them access to your
mailbox store root (can't remember what it's called in Outlook).

HTH!


Sverre
 
Top