I really do not, as I host my own sites.
My html for my default page is 8k, the same page with the 2
lines for the include removed is 4k.
: Wow - you really worry about this? I'm just curious....
:
: --
: Murray
: ============
:
: : > OK, I was not sure. But it still will take up more space
on
: > the server per se. The 185 was just some number.
: >
: >
message
: > : > : And - 185K is too big for a webpage....
: > :
: > : But Thomas is right. If anything is changed, the
whole
: > magilla is
: > : downloaded.
: > :
: > : --
: > : Murray
: > : ============
: > :
: > : : > : > Ok, but no, as the main page is what is always
: > downloaded to the browser,
: > : > the browser should never see the include pages as
: > separate files.
: > : >
: > : > --
: > : > ==============================================
: > : > Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
: > : > ==============================================
: > : > If you feel your current issue is a results of
: > installing
: > : > a Service Pack or security update, please contact
: > : > Microsoft Product Support Services:
: > : >
http://support.microsoft.com
: > : > If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
: > : > security update, then there is usually no charge for
the
: > call.
: > : > ==============================================
: > : >
message
: > : > : > : >> ----lost in thought for a moment----
: > : >>
: > : >> If the page had already been visited, and was in
the
: > local
: > : >> cache is what I think I was thinking about
: > : >>
: > : >>
: > : >> : > : >> : What do you mean by downloaded, the browser would
: > always
: > : >> see a 185K file requested in your example.
: > : >> :
: > : >> : --
: > : >> : ==============================================
: > : >> : Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
: > : >> : ==============================================
: > : >> : If you feel your current issue is a results of
: > installing
: > : >> : a Service Pack or security update, please contact
: > : >> : Microsoft Product Support Services:
: > : >> :
http://support.microsoft.com
: > : >> : If the problem can be shown to have been caused
by a
: > : >> : security update, then there is usually no charge
for
: > the
: > : >> call.
: > : >> : ==============================================
: > : >> :
: > message
: > : >> : : > : >> : > Would this be a valid example of the 'FP
Include"
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : > default page is 10k, and has 3 includes-
: > : >> : > include 1 is 100k
: > : >> : > include 2 is 50k
: > : >> : > include 3 is 25k
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : > The actual default page would then be on the
server
: > as
: > : >> 185k,
: > : >> : > and the 3 include pages would also be there for
: > another
: > : >> 175k
: > : >> : > If 1 thing was changed on any of the 4 files,
when
: > the
: > : >> : > default page was loaded it would need to
download
: > the
: > : >> 185k
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : > If this was asp included, the default would be
the
: > 10k,
: > : >> and
: > : >> : > the server would still have the 175k for
includes
: > : >> : > If 1 thing was changed on any of the 4 files,
then
: > only
: > : >> the
: > : >> : > changed page would need to be downloaded, as
low as
: > 10k.
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : > So it becomes a bandwidth vs file management
issue
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : > Mike
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : >
message
: > : >> : > : > : >> : > : FP Includes are included when you save the
file,
: > : >> whereas
: > : >> : > SSI includes are included when the page is
: > : >> : > : requested from the server. If you want FP to
: > manage
: > : >> the
: > : >> : > hyperlinks and you want to see the include
: > : >> : > : during design, then you are stuck with FP
: > Includes.
: > : >> : > :
: > : >> : > : --
: > : >> : > :
==============================================
: > : >> : > : Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
: > : >> : > :
==============================================
: > : >> : > : If you feel your current issue is a results
of
: > : >> installing
: > : >> : > : a Service Pack or security update, please
contact
: > : >> : > : Microsoft Product Support Services:
: > : >> : > :
http://support.microsoft.com
: > : >> : > : If the problem can be shown to have been
caused
: > by a
: > : >> : > : security update, then there is usually no
charge
: > for
: > : >> the
: > : >> : > call.
: > : >> : > :
==============================================
: > : >> : > :
: > : >> : > : "chris" <
[email protected]>
wrote
: > in
: > : >> message
: > : >> : > :
: > : >>
: >
: > : >> : > : > Hello,
: > : >> : > : > I had a web site that used frontpage used
to
: > include
: > : >> 3
: > : >> : > other pages on every
: > : >> : > : > page of the site for navigational reasons.
I
: > noticed
: > : >> : > that if I ever updated
: > : >> : > : > these pages, it would take frontpage
forever to
: > do
: > : >> the
: > : >> : > update. It would also
: > : >> : > : > timeout and I would have to reapply the
save
: > over
: > : >> and
: > : >> : > over again. Is this
: > : >> : > : > because those include pages were on so many
of
: > my
: > : >> other
: > : >> : > web pages. Why is it
: > : >> : > : > such a big deal to update an include page
used
: > : >> : > throughout a web site.
: > : >> : > : >
: > : >> : > : > My question is, since I am using ASP pages,
am
: > I
: > : >> better
: > : >> : > off including them
: > : >> : > : > using asp code for includes? The only
reason I
: > : >> didn't do
: > : >> : > that is because
: > : >> : > : > frontpage does not let you see the included
: > page in
: > : >> the
: > : >> : > design mode unless
: > : >> : > : > you use frontpage includes. I am stuck
between
: > : >> : > performance and wysiwyg
: > : >> : > : > editing.
: > : >> : > : >
: > : >> : > : > Any comments are appreciated
: > : >> : > : > Thanks
: > : >> : > :
: > : >> : > :
: > : >> : >
: > : >> : >
: > : >> :
: > : >> :
: > : >>
: > : >>
: > : >
: > : >
: > :
: > :
: >
: >
:
:
