HTML Gibberish

R

Russell

When I send emails using HTML, the email looks fine until I send it (via
Server 2000) at which point it is saved as gibberish (sometimes with Oriental
letters) and the recipient receives gibberish.

I want to be able to send in HTML and do not want the solution of using Rich
Text or Plain Text only.

Help and thanks
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

SEnding in HTML is the second least favorite method of sending email. Many
people block HTML or have clients that do not understand HTML (Pine, Outlook
97, etc.)

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, Russell asked:

| When I send emails using HTML, the email looks fine until I send it
| (via Server 2000) at which point it is saved as gibberish (sometimes
| with Oriental letters) and the recipient receives gibberish.
|
| I want to be able to send in HTML and do not want the solution of
| using Rich Text or Plain Text only.
|
| Help and thanks
 
R

Russell

Thanks Milly. That may be true. HOWEVER, I receive a significant number of
HTML emails every day. In order to reply, I can then: (a) merely reply in
HTML in which case they receive and I keep gibberish, (b) manually change the
reply to Plain Text and then reconvert to Rich Text (both a pain and if I
inadvertently forget to manually change it, I go back to problem (a) and (c)
I can set my Outlook 2003 to receive all emails in Plain Text but then, while
it solves the sending problem, I do not receive all of the content of the
original HTML message.

Bottom line, I need a solution to the HTML problem other than not to send in
HTML and would love if you could offer a suggestion.
 
G

Gary Smith

Tin here. What's the LEAST favorite?


Milly Staples said:
SEnding in HTML is the second least favorite method of sending email. Many
people block HTML or have clients that do not understand HTML (Pine, Outlook
97, etc.)
--?
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Number one on the hit parade is: Outlook Rich Text Format - only Outlook
and Eudora can read it.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, Gary Smith asked:

| Tin here. What's the LEAST favorite?
|
|
| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|| SEnding in HTML is the second least favorite method of sending
|| email. Many people block HTML or have clients that do not understand
|| HTML (Pine, Outlook 97, etc.)
|
|| --?
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|
|| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
|| the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
|| personal account will be deleted without reading.
|
|| After furious head scratching, Russell asked:
|
||| When I send emails using HTML, the email looks fine until I send it
||| (via Server 2000) at which point it is saved as gibberish (sometimes
||| with Oriental letters) and the recipient receives gibberish.
|||
||| I want to be able to send in HTML and do not want the solution of
||| using Rich Text or Plain Text only.
|||
||| Help and thanks
 
G

Gary Smith

Oh yeah, I've seen that problem. Fortunately our Exchange server is set
up to convert all RTF messages to plain text automatically if they're
going outside our system. That has probablt prevented hundreds of
thousands of cases of "Sorry about that. I'll re-send."


Milly Staples said:
Number one on the hit parade is: Outlook Rich Text Format - only Outlook
and Eudora can read it.
--?
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.
After furious head scratching, Gary Smith asked:
| Tin here. What's the LEAST favorite?
|
|
| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|| SEnding in HTML is the second least favorite method of sending
|| email. Many people block HTML or have clients that do not understand
|| HTML (Pine, Outlook 97, etc.)
|
|| --?
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|
|| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
|| the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
|| personal account will be deleted without reading.
|
|| After furious head scratching, Russell asked:
|
||| When I send emails using HTML, the email looks fine until I send it
||| (via Server 2000) at which point it is saved as gibberish (sometimes
||| with Oriental letters) and the recipient receives gibberish.
|||
||| I want to be able to send in HTML and do not want the solution of
||| using Rich Text or Plain Text only.
|||
||| Help and thanks
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Absolutely... until the Internet standard changes, sending in plain text
format is the only format guaranteed to work with every mail client.

Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your point of view, formatting
in messages has become something of a necessity for some business emails (I
am deliberately omitting the inclusion of a company logo since this adds
nothing to the value of the email) and options that allow for formatting
will be chosen over plain text.

Bottom line, only send RTF to folks internally or who you KNOW use
Outlook/Eudora. Otherwise, stick to HTML except for those folks who use
Outlook 97, Pine, or any other text only mail client.

Oh, heck... just send plain text.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, Gary Smith asked:

| Oh yeah, I've seen that problem. Fortunately our Exchange server is
| set
| up to convert all RTF messages to plain text automatically if they're
| going outside our system. That has probablt prevented hundreds of
| thousands of cases of "Sorry about that. I'll re-send."
|
|
| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|| Number one on the hit parade is: Outlook Rich Text Format - only
|| Outlook and Eudora can read it.
|
|| --?
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|
|| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
|| the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
|| personal account will be deleted without reading.
|
|| After furious head scratching, Gary Smith asked:
|
||| Tin here. What's the LEAST favorite?
|||
|||
||| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|||| SEnding in HTML is the second least favorite method of sending
|||| email. Many people block HTML or have clients that do not
|||| understand HTML (Pine, Outlook 97, etc.)
|||
|||| --?
|||| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
|||
|||| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due
|||| to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my
|||| personal account will be deleted without reading.
|||
|||| After furious head scratching, Russell asked:
|||
||||| When I send emails using HTML, the email looks fine until I send
||||| it (via Server 2000) at which point it is saved as gibberish
||||| (sometimes with Oriental letters) and the recipient receives
||||| gibberish.
|||||
||||| I want to be able to send in HTML and do not want the solution of
||||| using Rich Text or Plain Text only.
|||||
||||| Help and thanks
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top