Kenny F said:
The Entourage trash and the Finder trash work essentially the same way. You
toss stuff in there when you are done with it, but when the trash gets
"trashed" it's gone, permanently. They are both the same that way.
When you "deleted them from the deleted items folder" you must have gotten
the warning dialog -
"Are you sure you want to empty the 'Deleted Items' folder?
Entourage will permanently delete all messages and subfolders in this
folder."
You chose to delete them permanently.
The issue here is actually rather profound. A computer is a tool, like a
hammer. If you choose to whack yourself on the thumb with the hammer,
the hammer can't stop you. And you can accidentally whack yourself on
the thumb. The difference between the hammer and the computer is that we
get used to the idea that the computer is "intelligent", at least to the
extent of having enough safeguards to save us from our own stupidity.
But:
(1) This is a veneer, an illusion. Ultimately (bugs aside, of course)
the computer is just going to do what you tell it to do, so it's up to
you to mean what you say and to say what you mean.
(2) This is actually quite a difficult design problem. In a program I
wrote, I did in fact put in a second dialog:
"Do you really want to delete all messages?"
User: OK
"Do you really, really, REALLY want to delete ALL messages?"
User: YES!
At this point the user has chosen a menu item and replied in the
affirmative to two dialogs, so the program obeys. But whether the second
dialog is insulting or helpful depends upon your point of view; and
there is no denying that it starts down a slippery slope: how long are
we to keep this up? The simple fact is that sooner or later any program
or system simply has to stop putting up warning messages and obey the
user's commands; otherwise the user will never get anything done. (This
is the same point made by Bill Weylock earlier.)
Now, whether you were given *enough* warning depends on where you sit.
In the case of Entourage I think an argument can be made that there is
not enough warning, or perhaps that the warning is not sufficiently
strong (perhaps the OP would have got the message if instead of
"permanently" the dialog had said "THIS ACTION CANNOT BE UNDONE!". But
the "Delete" button is not the default - the user must physically use
the mouse - so that point of view, while it has some merit, does not
have much. m.