Wiley said:
Interesting debate. You both make good points. However, if I had one
question to ask someone to get a feel for the MSP proficiency, I would ask
them to explain Task Type and how to use the different types. This is
something that is not well expplained in a lot of books and articles. Those
without significant hands on experience in manipulating Task Type to control
Units, Duartion, and Work will have trouble here. As I have frequented this
forum in the last few months, I see so many users who would not have to post
questions if they understood what went on behind the scenes when one of the
Task Types is selected or changed.
I agree that this is also a good indicator, and if I were conducting 1
- 2 hr interviews to hire a Project instructor, it would be one of the
questions I'd ask. But if I were looking for a good instructor to take
a class from, and didn't want to spend a great deal of time with every
candidate, I'd use the autolink question. It's a matter of trying to
find out as quickly as possible if someone has the knowledge to teach
it. I might want to ask other questions to find out if the person is a
good instructor or not, but that's another matter.
I think the reason I'm getting so much heat on this is that I've picked
a question that some of the experts here didn't know the answer to the
first time I posted this idea. I probably should have caveated myself
by saying that you can still be an "expert" and not know this. For what
ever reasons, maybe some people just hadn't stumbled across it, though
it's hard for me to imagine. It was the first major obstacle I found in
applying Project when I was first learning it. I kept finding these
"mystery links" in my schedules. I finally spent an hour and a half
going through menus and combing the manual finding the cause. And I was
stunned when I found it! The idea that the software knows what tasks
should be linked. Absurd!
When I spoke with one of the 5 senior scheduling consultants that MS
hired while they were developing Project for Windows some years ago, he
told me that all of them were agast when they saw what MS had done, and
tried, in vain, to advise against it. But that discussion is part of
the reason why I consider this to be a very important key to
understanding Project. Even Pyron recommends against using this feature
in his books.
My intent is not to insult anyone, but if others are embarrassed by the
fact they failed to discern this issue, I can't help it. My intent is
only to help the OP, and others, to find an instructor who is not a
"button pusher", but someone who can really help their students to
implement Project in the real world. I certainly did not mean to imply
that any of the regular contributors to this NG weren't qualified to
teach Project. If they feel that I have implied that, they need to look
inward, not toward me.
Hope this helps in your world.