I think what you read is that tool tips won't work in the PPT Viewer, Paul.
So, if you have explanatory text that pops up when you hover over a link,
*that* won't work. But the links themselves work, as do action buttons.
What I'd recommend is you download the 97 PPT Viewer, install it, open it,
navigate to your presentation, and see how it works. You want this file:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...8E-5513-46C4-AA4F-058A84A37DF1&displaylang=EN
This downloads PPView97.exe To answer your specific question, PPView97.exe
will install PPView32.exe and related necessary files. I would download it
instead of installing it from the CD just to make sure you have the most
up-to-date version of this Viewer that's available. (The version that's on
one of the install CDs -- maybe 2000, probably 97, but I can't remember for
sure -- was superseded by a newer 97 Viewer/PPView32.exe.)
If you burn PPView32.exe to your CD, it will not be installed, but it won't
run even when it's double-clicked. The PPT 97 Viewer needs a whole bunch of
DLL files and other things installed to the CD in order to run.
I don't know if PowerLink Plus and Autorun CD Project Creator still have an
option to use the old Viewer (the 97 PPT Viewer) or not.
http://www.soniacoleman.com/Tutorials/tutorials.htm You might drop a line to
Sonia and ask. There's an "email me" button on the individual PLP and ACDPC
pages.
You can find "do it yourself" info on my site at
http://www.echosvoice.com/autoruncd.htm
Maybe you could provide the actual PPView97.exe file (the PPTView32
installation file) so your prof can install it. She'd have to open the
Viewer after installing it, navigate to your presentation, and then open it,
though, because if she just double-clicks your PPT/PPS file, it will open in
her installed version of PPT.
As you mentioned below, if you have PPT 2002 or 2003 available, it may be
easiest just to test your presentation in it, see what it looks like, and
tweak it as necessary. Your 2000 animations should run the same in both PPT
2002 and 2003. (Oh, and PPT 2002 comes with Office XP, so sometimes people
will refer to it as PPT XP. You can check the version of PPT by opening it
and going to Help/About.)
--
Echo [MS PPT MVP]
http://www.echosvoice.com
PJS said:
I appreciate the info. Thanks so much. Proceeding along the lines that
autorun will solve this:
I went to the site, found the info, and was all ready to do it when I came
across the caveat of hyperlinks not working in the 97 viewer (at least in
the procedure I read.) I wouldn't have minded sacrificing some grade points
by dumping my few animated gifs but hyperlinks are a must - it's the T in
MST (Math Science Technology) -- the assignment requires that the students
go on an internet scavenger hunt.
I also read that ppview32.exe, part of PP2000, is the same as the 97 viewer.
Is that right? Totally identical? I ask because the autorun faq said
hyperlinks, etc. don't work properly because the autorun procedure does not
"fully install PP Viewer9"7 My point is, if I burned both the ppview32.exe
file that came with PP2000 and my pps presentation directly to cd, would a
"full install" of the viewer then be in place (or am I desperately being
overly semantic?) Because then I'd just have my professor manually click on
the pps file to view it, rather than autorun.
Lastly, I've used the stock PP2000 action buttons on each slide that
need
to
be manually clicked upon to go to the next slide. When I read about the
hyperlink problem with viewer97 I checked the action settings for how they
work. The menu item says "hyperlink." Is this really another type of
hyperlink that won't work with viewer97, or just Microsoft jargon and
nothing for me to worry about.
My queasy feeling is that I'm going to have to break up alot of my work into
separate slides and tone the whole thing down. I can think of some
workarounds to slow the tempo down (the original problem, after all), such
as using the typewriter effect for text. However, my feeling is that too
many "tricks" will be a distraction.
Thanks again,
Paul
Echo S said:
I think you just need to create an autorun CD. That will play the file from
the CD using the PPT Viewer (which you have to set up to run from the CD).
Your prof can just put the CD in and the thing will run. Nothing will be
installed on her system.
Doing it that way allows you to use the PPT 97 Viewer, which should display
your animations as you designed them. Don't use animated GIFs or picture
bullets, as the 97 Viewer won't support them. And, of course, after you
download and install the PPT Viewer but before you go to the trouble of
making a CD, open the Viewer, navigate to your presentation, and make sure
it runs the way you want it to.
Make an AutoRun CD
http://www.rdpslides.com/pptfaq/FAQ00037.htm
--
Echo [MS PPT MVP]
http://www.echosvoice.com
The newer computer is only eight months old so it must be running a newer
version of PPT. I didn't check the version -- it's a relative's notebook,
who's never used PP. Hence, when I inserted the burned CD with the
pps
I
needed to then insert my own Office2000 disc to activate it.
However, it is not the computer the pps will be run on. It will be
run
on
one belonging to my MST professor, and it's anyone's guess what she will
use. She clearly stated that she digs, and grades on, mucho bells and
whistles, creativity, et al. However, I'm not sure she understands the
extent of my overly fecund belled and whistled mind. Probably I'm making
something of PP that it is not designed to be. In a nutshell, in a single
slide I'll have custom animation events stacked up, and separated by the
"in
seconds after previous event [00:00]." Each slide is like a little
interactive thingie unto itself, e.g.: a narrative appears, a character
enters and has a dialogue with a talk balloon with text, there's graphic
objects that need appear and dim, more narrative, more talk balloon, etc.
Then it's on to the next slide with more or less of the same. It's
like
a
storyboard where timing is crucial -- if the pace and timing is messed
with,
such as when I played it on the newer computer, then the whole thing goes
by
too fast to be effective, let alone informative, which is the real intent
(it's an elementary grade science unit.) Maybe I have to go much more
conventional with it.
Some sections are still workable. One technique that still works well,
which
is the only useful consolation I can offer for reading this far
(and