Then why does Outlook 2003 support such a crappy and unreliable feature?
1) Outlook may not mind giving people a false sense of security.
2) Outlook (i.e. its managers) seem to have a rather blinkered world-view
that thinks that everyone else in the world is also on Outlook. as it
happens, Outlook, unlike Entourage, was built on top of an earlier app that
was entirely "intranet" - just within an organization. It added some
intranet messaging to a personal Information Manager. So in those days
(Windows 95) it was actually a reasonable assumption to make: anyone you
were corresponding with had the same capabilities. Then when it became an
internet app open to eh rest of the world, a pretty high proportion of
correspondents were still within the organization, and many of the others
had Outlook Express Windows. It has just never cared too much about the rest
of the world, and often ignores internet standards. Entourage has never made
any such assumption. It was built on top of an email app (OE Mac) which knew
from the start that most of its email correspondents would be on other apps,
many of them Mac apps. It never made any sense to introduce a "feature"
doomed to failure. It depends on the recipient app being set up to return
receipts. Since many don't, you never know whether your message was never
received. It's pointless, and would be a total waste of time and resources
to add this feature. If you want that level of unreliability, just add it
yourself in "Additional Headers" box of the Options tab of
Tools/Accounts/that account. Add a Disposition-Notification-To header, and
in the Value box type your email address.
--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <
http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <
http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>
Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.
PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.