J
Jeffrok4
Microsoft's is shooting themselve's in the foot with the insistence that web
pages must be replete with active content. The Department of Homeland
Security site has a posting recommending users move to Mozilla Firefox or
another, more secure browser simply because the active content is where all
the spies and infections live. Yes, you can be attacked using Firefox. The
likelyhood is so much more remote though, it constitutes a large safety
margin. Do we want to surf sites with spinning GIF's and scrolling banners so
badly we have to tolerate identity theft and downtime to do repairs on our
systems?
Or would we rather enjoy the web for it's native enjoyment without the bells
and whistles and have healthy machines to do it on.
pages must be replete with active content. The Department of Homeland
Security site has a posting recommending users move to Mozilla Firefox or
another, more secure browser simply because the active content is where all
the spies and infections live. Yes, you can be attacked using Firefox. The
likelyhood is so much more remote though, it constitutes a large safety
margin. Do we want to surf sites with spinning GIF's and scrolling banners so
badly we have to tolerate identity theft and downtime to do repairs on our
systems?
Or would we rather enjoy the web for it's native enjoyment without the bells
and whistles and have healthy machines to do it on.