TO: instead of BCC:

[ngaisteve1]

When we use BCC to send bulk e-mail, the recipient won't be seeing other
than itself in BCC. But, my question is, Is it possible to have the
similiar way but in TO instead of BCC. Meaning, I send bulk of 100 but
when the recipient receive it, their e-mail falls under TO and not BCC.
Hope you guys understand here.

Thanks.

 

[Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote]

Only if you want them to see everybody else too. Otherwise you'd have to
send the messages one at a time to each individual recipient.

 

[Vanguard]

When we use BCC to send bulk e-mail, the recipient won't be seeing
other than itself in BCC. But, my question is, Is it possible to have
the similiar way but in TO instead of BCC. Meaning, I send bulk of
100 but when the recipient receive it, their e-mail falls under TO
and not BCC. Hope you guys understand here.

Thanks.

Use Mail Merge in a matching version of Word.

 

[Rich Cervenka]

When we use BCC to send bulk e-mail, the recipient won't be seeing other
than itself in BCC. But, my question is, Is it possible to have the
similiar way but in TO instead of BCC. Meaning, I send bulk of 100 but
when the recipient receive it, their e-mail falls under TO and not BCC.

No, that's not possible unless you do a mail merge.
--
Rich Cervenka
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Email Client: Microsoft Outlook 2002/2003
News Client (Text): Forté Agent 1.93 www.forteinc.com
News Client (Binaries): News Rover 9.0 www.newsrover.com