Allen Browne said:
Albert, do you have any info on this?
Do we rename ACCDE files to ACCDR as well?
If we want to "hide up" things, then yes...I would suggest doing this.
in a20033 (or a2007), creating a mde never did hide any of the interface...
so, fact, for my a2003 "mde" files, I usually did provide a shortcut with
"/runtime" switch.
And, I even supplied that "/runtime" shortcut for users with the FULL
version of ms-access.
The reason why always provided a shortcut is because I always wanted to hide
the ms-access interface. If I use the access runtime, then I do NOT need the
/runtime switch. However, if a user all of a sudden gets the full version,
then my application is going to display a lot of extra things. So, even when
the user has a full version or runtime version of access I simply always
used the /runtime switch to hide things.
So, my goal was to keep the user experience *consistent* regardless of what
version they have.
So, now, in a2007, I don't have to provide a shortcut. (and, those pesky
uses can now browse to the folder,skip my shortcut..and STILL run in
/runtime mode).
I do think that this "R" use idea is much better for when using a mde
(accDE -> accDR), but you *can* use it for accDB.
to be honest, I never used the /runtime switch for a standard mdb in
a2003..and likely would not do so for a2007 (or, now use the "R" ability).
I don't like recommending here in the newsgroup that users just start willy
nilly re-naming file extensions (not the best thing to teach everyone!!!).
However, most machines have file extensions turned off by default. A good
number of users don't even know what a file extension is these days!!!
So, for budding access developers...if they don't (or can't) provide a
runtime shortcut..then the "R" idea is a rather nice option now...