C
ConfusedNHouston
I have no idea if this can be done. I have work requests that are directed
to a single mailbox; we'll call it GROUP. Three workers access the GROUP
mailbox. They open a request, peform the requested task, and open the next
request.
The problem is that one worker might handle 50 requests and another might
handle 10 in the same period time.
If a rule could be written or if some other means exists to change the
address from Group to Group #20, Group #21, Group #22, in sequence then I
could much more easily track who is handling what requests.
Any ideas for how to do this? I mentioned a rule. Even if the sequencing
is done after receipt, as long as it's not a manual numbering method, it
could possibly be of benefit.
Thanks.
to a single mailbox; we'll call it GROUP. Three workers access the GROUP
mailbox. They open a request, peform the requested task, and open the next
request.
The problem is that one worker might handle 50 requests and another might
handle 10 in the same period time.
If a rule could be written or if some other means exists to change the
address from Group to Group #20, Group #21, Group #22, in sequence then I
could much more easily track who is handling what requests.
Any ideas for how to do this? I mentioned a rule. Even if the sequencing
is done after receipt, as long as it's not a manual numbering method, it
could possibly be of benefit.
Thanks.