BUG: Sending message x of x

Discussion in 'Outlook General' started by JNATION Rocks!, Apr 8, 2007.

  1. Yet another Outlook 2007 bug. I get "sending 13 of 13" when choosing
    Send/Receive except the problem is that I'm not sending any messages.
    I think this happens when I'm sending one message.

    And my G-d, it's slow. It hits the hard drive endlessly. Does anyone
    else notice that your hard drive won't stop spinning with Outlook 2007
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 8, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. Most of what you are calling "bugs" are most likely not. Many are probably
    settings you have misconfigured.
    Did you even bother to create a new profile after you upgraded? That has
    always been a requirement in Outlook.
    Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook], Apr 8, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Take a look at the messages in the outbox. Is one of them larger is size
    than your ISP allows. If so, go to File, choose Work Offline. Delete the
    files. Close Outlook and open Outlook and again File, Work Online.
    If that's not the answer, review your account settings, Tools | Account
    Settings | Double click on the account, verify the settings.
    Charles W Davis, Apr 8, 2007
  4. What setting did I misconfigure when Outlook tells me it is sending
    message 13 of 13 when I didn't create more than one message to send in
    the outbox?

    With regard to the profile, I followed the entire upgrade process to
    the letter.
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 8, 2007
  5. Get real. Upgrade installations never work for Outlook and never have.
    Hardly a secret. Read these groups. Follow the advice that has been posted
    to you twice already. Stop posting things as bugs when they apply only to
    Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook], Apr 8, 2007
  6. So Russ, what you're saying is that the Outlook upgrade - and I did
    buy the "upgrade" version - is so buggy that it doesn't work for

    "A software bug is an error, flaw, mistake, failure, or fault in a
    computer program that prevents it from behaving as intended (e.g.,
    producing an incorrect result)." (Wikipedia)

    I'm sure I'm not the only one with the problems I'm encountering and
    was hoping someone else could assist. Researching on Google to see if
    I'm the ONLY one reveals that you're barking up the wrong tree:


    "an inability of Outlook to keep up with text as it is being typed and
    slowness in sending and receiving e-mails"

    Yep, both problems I'm having but NO ANSWERS. These aren't power users
    features but basic tasks.

    Your advice is invaluable. Basically I'm stuck with spending hours to
    rebuild my Outlook settings the way I want them from scratch with the
    hope of Outlook 2007 behaving properly -- as Outlook 2003 does very
    well. If I would have know that bit of genius BEFORE I spent $450 on
    the Office 2007 upgrade I never would have "upgraded."
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 8, 2007
  7. Here's the official BUG:

    I just sent 7 messages in the queue. I got "sending message 12 of 18"

    Apparently for whatever reason Outlook keeps adding 11 to the total
    number of messages being sent. 7+11 = 18. I have more than 11 pop
    accounts in there so something is off and the number 11 is of
    significance somewhere.

    So Russ, is this a bug or a feature?
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 8, 2007
  8. JNATION Rocks!

    F.H. Muffman Guest

    PMFJI, but, I'd recommend reading
    http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id270918 before you continue
    to label things as bugs.

    Consider it like this. When your car has a problem, does that mean that
    it's a problem that should force a recall, or is it just a problem with your
    car. It doesn't make it any *less* of a problem to you, but it doesn't make
    it a recall. Just like what you're calling a 'bug' isn't any less of an
    issue, it is just not a bug.
    F.H. Muffman, Apr 9, 2007
  9. All of you guys are just too smart for me. RTFM. I've been doing this
    just as long if not longer than many of you. The sending message
    numbers in outlook 2007 are WRONG. WRONG.

    If you write an application that adds up two numbers - that's all it
    does -- and you get 2+1 resulting in 4 then it is a BUG. It can be a
    small bug or a large bug but it is still a bug.

    I've now tested send and receive. With outlook 2003 it was correctly
    reporting the number of messages being sent. If I sent 2 messages I
    saw "sending 2 of 2" with Outlook 2003. In Outlook 2007 I am reporting
    "sending 16 of 16" which is wrong. Could there be corruption on my
    machine? Perhaps but highly unlikely. Could it be that the upgrade
    process has caused a problem? Thus this is a bug, whether it is the
    upgrade process or the number of messages being reported sent.

    This alone should not force a recall of Outlook 2007 but I'm having a
    difficult time getting it to function effectively and noticing these
    little but highly visible bugs that make me question the release at
    this time. I've now listed some others that more research reveals have
    been reported by many others with no solutions except for smart
    answers on reading what is to be called a "bug" in this newsgroup.
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 9, 2007
  10. Cool your jets. This is a public peer to peer newsgroup. That reality seems
    to have escaped you. You are asking advice from volunteers who provide that
    advice free of charge to you. If you choose not to follow the advice we
    provide, that is your choice. When you do you, you then have no right to
    bust our chops when you fail to do what we suggest. Do what we suggest or do
    not post back.
    Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook], Apr 9, 2007
  11. JNATION Rocks!

    F.H. Muffman Guest

    Wrong? Have you done a network trace to view the SMTP conversation and
    verify that Outlook (not you, but Outlook) is not sending however many
    messages it thinks it is sending?
    You are 100% right on that. A program written to add numbers that doesn't
    do it properly is a bug. But not necessarily in the program itself.
    Remember the Pentium floating point bug? Was it a bug in the programs that
    depended upon the chip? No, but it would sure look like it.

    But, still, you haven't shown that Outlook is not actually sending 13

    Maybe, just maybe, the change is that in Outlook 2003 it was
    *underreporting* messages being sent, or maybe it didn't count messages that
    were hidden in the outbox.
    Do a network trace of the SMTP. If you're having trouble reading it, feel
    free to email it to me and I can give you an assist. If you find that it's
    only sending 1 message, then sure, it sounds like it *might* be a bug.

    And if it is, call in to technical support and report it. Because Microsoft
    doesn't monitor these groups and there's no guarantee that they've seen this
    issue before.
    F.H. Muffman, Apr 9, 2007
  12. JNATION Rocks!

    Peter Foldes Guest

    Apparently for whatever reason Outlook keeps adding 11 to the total
    That is because you probably have 2 sets of pst files installed. How did you import the pst files from Outlook 2003?

    Do a search after enabling Show all (Hidden) Files and see where they are located. If not there then your profile is corrupted and set up a new profile.

    This is not a bug in Outlook but a user created issue.
    Peter Foldes, Apr 9, 2007
  13. With regard to the profile, I followed the entire upgrade process to
    Including making a new profile?

    Could any of the things its attempting to send be read receipts?
    Diane Poremsky [MVP], Apr 9, 2007
  14. I understand and apologize that this got out of hand. Perhaps I was a
    little put off by the tone of your first email that started this.
    Let's see what we can do about ending that part.
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 9, 2007
  15. Thank you for your assistance. I only have one pst file and always
    have. Outlook installed itself and used my existing pst. Everything
    else works, accounts are all there.
    I have all my hidden files and folders revealed. I looked in the
    Outlook folder in the Docs and Folders which reveals just one pst
    Really... This is why I got irate - it can't be a bug, it has to be
    the user. I performed the upgrade *as instructed.*. I did not create
    anything new. I did not modify anything I was told not to touch.
    Outlook 2003 worked flawlessly.

    If there is a failure here it is a failure of the Microsoft upgrade
    process that is still unexplained as to why Outlook keeps thinking it
    is sending more messages than it is -- unless some variable is off
    somewhere. Perhaps this is superficial but it is still unexplained and
    nobody can point to anything I did wrong as instructed by Microsoft
    during the upgrade process.
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 9, 2007
  16. A profile exists in the Mail control panel and this apparently was
    done correctly. All my old accounts work perfectly.
    No. I'm not connected to an exchange server - good suggestion though.

    I think I figured it out - and it is a
    bug/mistype/error/mistake/flub/glitch call it whatever you want on
    Microsoft's part. That is unless I somehow created a user error of
    miraculous proportions.

    Sending an email this time quickly updated a number that looked like a
    12. I realize that I have 14 pop email accounts. Sending 1 email made
    it "14 of 14" and more emails made it more from there with the same
    number. I sent 1 email from 2 different accounts and found the first
    one saying: "sending message 6 of 7" for the first one and "sending
    message 14 of 14" for the last one. So what Outlook 2007 is counting
    email accounts and adding in the number of emails per account of the
    last account. I just sent 4 emails - 2 from account 6 and 2 from
    account 14. I ended having 16 email messages sent and for some reason
    got a "sending message 13 of 16."

    At least it's reproducible now and consistent. I'm hoping we can fan
    the flames. I just didn't like MVP members to tell me I should stop
    calling things bugs when obviously it's an idiot user error. If there
    is an error it is in Microsoft not providing a good upgrade path,
    instructions or even a user manual one can use in any form, be it PDF,
    on the DVDs that I paid hundreds of dollars for.
    JNATION Rocks!, Apr 9, 2007
  17. Indeed, you did nothing wrong. It is perfectly reasonable to expect an
    upgrade installation to work. But upgrade installations of Outlook do not
    work and never have. Microsoft has not admitted it, but we end users have
    documented it extensively in these groups and provided the necessary
    Many if not all of the problems you are having are from your corrupt
    profile. Until you correct that, there is no way to know which of your
    problems might remain and actually qualify as a bug in the software.
    Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook], Apr 9, 2007
  18. So you upgraded and are using the old profile you used with Outlook 2003?
    There are issues with reusing an old profile and we recommend making a new
    profile for best results.

    BTW - read receipts have nothing to do with exchange and in fact, often 'get
    stuck' when you receive mail on a lot of accounts.
    Diane Poremsky [MVP], Apr 9, 2007
  19. JNATION Rocks!

    4sight Guest

    I agree. This is a BUG. My Outlook 2007 worked fine initially for 3 months and very recently showing me wrong numbers for sending mesage. Even, If I don't send any, it shows "Sending Message 2 of 2" and there is nothing in the outbox to send. All crazy efforts to create new profile did go in vain. This also create some security concern as we don't know if a copy of a message going elsewhere!!!!!

    EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
    4sight, Apr 18, 2007
  20. Perhaps undeliverable read receipts. See this:
    Describe exactly how you're trying to do this and exactly what happens at
    each step when you do. "go in vain" doesn't tell us much.
    Brian Tillman, Apr 18, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.