J
Jørn Jørgensen
Hi,
We are considering roll out Office 2003 using Group Policies, but we have
had some feedback that Office is to large to be efficiently deployed in this
fashion.
We have a couple of dozen sites with 5-20 users at each, and have a need for
many different Office configurations (eg. one user may only need Word and
Excel while another requires Outlook and Project).
We are planning the following configuration:
* All users located in one OU
* Users are made members of application groups for each of the Office
applications, eg. App_Word2003
* Applications are assigned to users using Group Policies
* GPO's correspond to groups and are applied to all users in the Users OU
based on membership
Is this a viable solution for Office 2003? Are there any particular pitfalls
we need to consider with this design?
Is it perhaps recommended to assign Office to the computers instead of the
users? What are some pros and cons of these different approaches?
Any input appreciated!
Regards,
Jørn
We are considering roll out Office 2003 using Group Policies, but we have
had some feedback that Office is to large to be efficiently deployed in this
fashion.
We have a couple of dozen sites with 5-20 users at each, and have a need for
many different Office configurations (eg. one user may only need Word and
Excel while another requires Outlook and Project).
We are planning the following configuration:
* All users located in one OU
* Users are made members of application groups for each of the Office
applications, eg. App_Word2003
* Applications are assigned to users using Group Policies
* GPO's correspond to groups and are applied to all users in the Users OU
based on membership
Is this a viable solution for Office 2003? Are there any particular pitfalls
we need to consider with this design?
Is it perhaps recommended to assign Office to the computers instead of the
users? What are some pros and cons of these different approaches?
Any input appreciated!
Regards,
Jørn