Generally, it is reported that few problems arise from running multiple Access
versions (keep them in separate folders, things like that).
There are a few issues to do with installing on Terminal Server, such as
needing a different "transform file" at least with Access2000.
Have you searched
http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/?adv=1 for
"terminal server" with each Access? Interesting, including that MS says
multiple Access is not supported (or tested) on Terminal Server!
A search suggests there are many things to be concerned about! Maybe you won't
come across most of them, so maybe it's better to test and then ask specific
questions?
A95 - are you really using this? You'll find no assistance whatever, either
from MS or fellow developers. It was the worst version bar none, and I don't
know of anyone who uses it. A95 (I imagine) is directly transferable to A97,
or to A2000etc with only minor issues.
A97 - though I still use this myself, MS support seems to be dropping off
rapidly. You can still search on A97 kb articles. For some of my products, I
dropped the A97 variant a year or so ago, taking A2000 or A2002 as a base
"standard".
The KB lists "sufficiently known" issues. You really have to test for yourself
as a) that may not be all the issues b) you might not come across many of
them. I tested installing A2000 on TS with no more issues than some transform
file. I would have considered, that multiple versions and an upgrade like
that, is perhaps time to consider standardising the Access version? Who wants
to know the peculiarities of each Access with TS, and who's paying?
Chris
