"Embedded image moved to file"

L

LaDonnaE

Outlook XP has recently started moving images to attachments. How can I stop
this and put the images back in the e-mail message where they belong?
 
B

Brian Tillman

LaDonnaE said:
Outlook XP has recently started moving images to attachments. How
can I stop this and put the images back in the e-mail message where
they belong?

Outlook 2002 has always shown attached images as attachments and embedded
images as embedded. The sender controls this, not the recipient.
 
R

ron-baby

Brian Tillman said:
Outlook 2002 has always shown attached images as attachments and embedded
images as embedded. The sender controls this, not the recipient.
Then why does Outlook say that it "moved" the embedded image?

Also, how can the sender make the images show up in the
email message body (and not be "moved" by Outlook)?

It is aggravating to have to open 2 dozen "moved" images
one at a time when I could simply scroll down to see them
in the message body.

Thanks a bunch,
ron-baby
 
B

Brian Tillman

Then why does Outlook say that it "moved" the embedded image?

Also, how can the sender make the images show up in the
email message body (and not be "moved" by Outlook)?

It is aggravating to have to open 2 dozen "moved" images
one at a time when I could simply scroll down to see them
in the message body.

I've never seen this particular message. Perhaps someone else has.
 
R

ron-baby

Brian Tillman said:
I've never seen this particular message. Perhaps someone else has.

Not trying to be pushy, but the OP's post
- to which you previously replied - contained
exactly what I am asking about, namely,
an "Embedded image moved to file";
therefore, I am confused about your
current statement about not having seen
"this particular message."
 
B

Brian Tillman

ron-baby said:
Not trying to be pushy, but the OP's post
- to which you previously replied - contained
exactly what I am asking about, namely,
an "Embedded image moved to file";
therefore, I am confused about your
current statement about not having seen
"this particular message."

I meant that I've never seen Outlook display that message, not that I didn't
read the original post in the newsgroup.
 
R

ron-baby

Brian Tillman said:
I meant that I've never seen Outlook display that message, not that I didn't
read the original post in the newsgroup.
Then what was your point in saying that you had not
seen that Outlook error message?
(It seemed that you were trying to solve the OP's problem
even though you had not seen the particular error message,
and then it seemed as if you were saying that you could not
solve the problem due to your not seeing it.)
 
B

Brian Tillman

ron-baby said:
Then what was your point in saying that you had not
seen that Outlook error message?
(It seemed that you were trying to solve the OP's problem
even though you had not seen the particular error message,
and then it seemed as if you were saying that you could not
solve the problem due to your not seeing it.)

Let me be more explicit: the original poster should provide evidence that it
is an Outlook problem by providing complete details of where the message is
displayed, what s/he does to get the message displayed, what has been done
so far in an attempt to solve the problem, what type of account is being
used, if there are any add-ins, and any other detail believed relevent. My
opinion is that she's receiving a message from a Yahoo group and it is
Yahoo's server that is providing that message, not Outlook, but there's no
way to know, since there is no data and the original thread seem to be gone.
 
Top