D
Dan Rea
Hi there,
I have noticed, after recently upgrading from office 97 (ha ha!) to 2003
that when I type in a date eg. 2004 11 23 that when zoomed to 100% it doesn't
appear to fit in a standard column. yet when I zoom to 300 or 400% it does,
this means that all of my older spreadsheets look like they don't fit in the
columns as they did before. This is very annoying as it means I can never
tell just by scanning over the sheet if everything is correct - I have to
zoom in and check every column/cell individually. I could widen then columns
but my templates are set for certain uses and must fit onto A4...even so
there is not really any point becuase the column values do actually fit - its
just a case of 'what you see is NOT what you print'.
Please help this is causing no end of bother.....
I don't think its a graphics/monitor issue as I checked another machine
running Office XP (not 2003 but I though i'd check a dif version) and this
seems to be an issue too. But for info I run a 17inch lcd monitor @ 1024x768
many thanks.
Dan
I have noticed, after recently upgrading from office 97 (ha ha!) to 2003
that when I type in a date eg. 2004 11 23 that when zoomed to 100% it doesn't
appear to fit in a standard column. yet when I zoom to 300 or 400% it does,
this means that all of my older spreadsheets look like they don't fit in the
columns as they did before. This is very annoying as it means I can never
tell just by scanning over the sheet if everything is correct - I have to
zoom in and check every column/cell individually. I could widen then columns
but my templates are set for certain uses and must fit onto A4...even so
there is not really any point becuase the column values do actually fit - its
just a case of 'what you see is NOT what you print'.
Please help this is causing no end of bother.....
I don't think its a graphics/monitor issue as I checked another machine
running Office XP (not 2003 but I though i'd check a dif version) and this
seems to be an issue too. But for info I run a 17inch lcd monitor @ 1024x768
many thanks.
Dan