D
Dennis Allen
Hi. I've been thinking of using Frontpage to take my web site,
www.dennisallen.com, and go frameless. Since I have a left framed frame.htm
with lots of javascipt code, is this a good idea?
I could use FP insert/components/web page to add my frame.htm page to all
other pages. But frame.htm has lots of javascript functions in the header,
and needs onload= to start them. I suppose I could move my <script> code
into the <body>. What are the advantages/disadvantages of <head> script
code as opposed to <body> script code?
Side question. Many of my pages have external <script src="temp.js"> calls.
In fact, a couple of pages I have to create a <body onload="xload()"> in
which xload() checks to make sure all the temp.js functions are loaded
before proceeding. Now it seems to me that the FP insert/component/page to
bypass this need altogether, but insert/component/page only asks for *.htm
files. What, do I want to convert my *.js files to *.htm files, wraping
<html><body><script></script></body></html> around them?
www.dennisallen.com, and go frameless. Since I have a left framed frame.htm
with lots of javascipt code, is this a good idea?
I could use FP insert/components/web page to add my frame.htm page to all
other pages. But frame.htm has lots of javascript functions in the header,
and needs onload= to start them. I suppose I could move my <script> code
into the <body>. What are the advantages/disadvantages of <head> script
code as opposed to <body> script code?
Side question. Many of my pages have external <script src="temp.js"> calls.
In fact, a couple of pages I have to create a <body onload="xload()"> in
which xload() checks to make sure all the temp.js functions are loaded
before proceeding. Now it seems to me that the FP insert/component/page to
bypass this need altogether, but insert/component/page only asks for *.htm
files. What, do I want to convert my *.js files to *.htm files, wraping
<html><body><script></script></body></html> around them?