frontpage+css xhtml

C

creator_web

Hi,
Please do give your views about creating a css+xhtml validity site
(Site without tables)using Frontpage.
 
K

Kevin Spencer

You're talking about 4 different issues:

1. Using CSS
2. Table-less layout with CSS
3. Using XHTML
4. Making a W3C-validatable site

Just to be clear.

As for number 1, I recommend using CSS, as it separates the layout style
from the HTML markup, making the page easier to maintain. In addition, the
use of external style sheets enables one to apply styles identically across
all (or a group of) pages in a web site easily.

2. Not a big deal. CSS has its place, and so do tables. Tables are excellent
for anything requiring tabular (rows and columns) layout.

3. For new development, an excellent idea. XHTML has many advantages over
HTML which are too numerous to revisit. Let's just say that the "X" makes
all the difference.

4. Not necessarily necessary. It all depends on what the web site is for.
Still, W3C validation is useful for a number of reasons. For one thing, it
ensures that (in the near future) a web page will behave the same in all
browsers. It also provides a free resource for error-checking.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
A brute awe as you,
a Metallic hag entity, eat us.
 
S

Stefan B Rusynko

PS

And if not done correctly many so called table less layouts I have seen
(using Divs and CSS to "position or align" them on the page to resemble a "table" layout)
are more of a strain on the browser / user than a html table
(especially on slower connections where I have seen them force the browser to re-render the page twice)

IMHO
- just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should do it

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


| You're talking about 4 different issues:
|
| 1. Using CSS
| 2. Table-less layout with CSS
| 3. Using XHTML
| 4. Making a W3C-validatable site
|
| Just to be clear.
|
| As for number 1, I recommend using CSS, as it separates the layout style
| from the HTML markup, making the page easier to maintain. In addition, the
| use of external style sheets enables one to apply styles identically across
| all (or a group of) pages in a web site easily.
|
| 2. Not a big deal. CSS has its place, and so do tables. Tables are excellent
| for anything requiring tabular (rows and columns) layout.
|
| 3. For new development, an excellent idea. XHTML has many advantages over
| HTML which are too numerous to revisit. Let's just say that the "X" makes
| all the difference.
|
| 4. Not necessarily necessary. It all depends on what the web site is for.
| Still, W3C validation is useful for a number of reasons. For one thing, it
| ensures that (in the near future) a web page will behave the same in all
| browsers. It also provides a free resource for error-checking.
|
| --
| HTH,
|
| Kevin Spencer
| Microsoft MVP
| .Net Developer
| A brute awe as you,
| a Metallic hag entity, eat us.
|
|
| | >
| > Hi,
| > Please do give your views about creating a css+xhtml validity site
| > (Site without tables)using Frontpage.
| >
| >
| >
| > --
| > creator_web
| > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > Posted via http://www.forum4designers.com
| > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message419930.html
| >
|
|
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top