Frontpage vs. Dreamweaver

S

Steve Easton

Regardless of which one you use, it is only as good as the person using it.


--
Steve Easton
Microsoft MVP FrontPage
95isalive
This site is best viewed..................
...............................with a computer
 
E

E. T. Culling

Google your question. It's been discussed here many times. I'll give you one
thought... The learning curve is much steeper with Dreamweaver. It's also
much more expensive. Dreamweaver has capabilites that FrontPage doesn't have
and many more 'third-party extensions'.
Eleanor
 
J

Joe Rohn

Some of the answer depends upon your background...but the one that is
"better" for you... cannot be answered by anyone but you :)

How's that for being politically correct? <g>

--
Joe

Microsoft MVP FrontPage

FrontPage Users Forums:
http://www.timeforweb.com/frontpage
 
B

Brett...

E. T. Culling said:
Google your question. It's been discussed here many times. I'll give
you one thought... The learning curve is much steeper with
Dreamweaver. It's also much more expensive. Dreamweaver has
capabilites that FrontPage doesn't have and many more 'third-party
extensions'. Eleanor
Click to expand...

Often stated as "fact" and previously I'd agree but I am not so sure when
comparing FP2003 and MX 2004 or DW8.
 
M

Murray

Here's the truth. If you know HTML and CSS, the learning curve with either
if relatively flat. The ramp will depend on the specific needs of the
learner more than the characteristics of the authoring system, I think.
 
Top