Hi Ashok,
Yes, we remember the "partner" in France, who tried to do business in a
manner that Groove Networks didn't approve.
In fact, this "partner" was not a Groove Networks partner, nor a
Microsoft partner, nor a partner of Hommes & Process ...
I agree with you and Mark, "someone providing a Groove Server services
on a reseller basis" is not supported by the Groove server license.
Note that a Services Provider License Agreement (SPLA) does not exist
for Groove.
Hommes & Process proposes to host and manage the customer's Groove
server, meaning that the customer will need to own the Groove server
license.
This is very different from providing Groove server services, where a
customer would not own the Groove server license. (That's what you refer
to, isn't it?)
Several customers don't have internal resources, hence they prefer to
outsource their Groove servers and the user administration.
A very logical and cost saving approach.
As you certainly will agree upon, there are very few companies world
wide with recognized Groove expertise who propose these outsourcing
services for Groove.
Note: In order to avoid any confusion maybe I should change my
vocabulary, and call our offering an outsourcing solution instead of a
hosting solution
Best regards,
Jan
Ashok Hingorani a écrit :