Lacking any other viable option I choose to use “PureTextâ€. Thanks for the
recommendation, and also of course to the author for the program itself.
WORD itself uses at least ten times more system resources than PureText.
PureText usage is an unfortunate consequence of Office 2003 forcing the
change of the default behaviour on a basic function (PASTE) that most other
applications implement in a logical way.
“Paste with format†should always have been an optional function, since it’s
an extension of the basic functionality (paste). And then options to choose
which format (source or destination) to apply by default, should have been
present.
That’s the logical way to have done it.
“Paste special†it’s very inconvenient to use continuously since it forces
you to perform every time, an extra selection and several extra clicks,
neither of which helps to improve the health of your fingers, or the speed of
your task.
I think, most likely there is some registry entry which perhaps just for
testing purposes, could change the default behaviour of the PASTE function.
The trick of course it’s to know which one it’s. If anybody knows it I would
appreciate if it could be e-mailed or posted here, but until then I’ll keep
using “PureTextâ€.
Cid.
ANONYMOUS said:
I prefer to do Paste Special instead!. PureText is yet another hog on
the system resources for which there may or may not be any support. In
UK we don't beieve in such things as FREE Lunch!