P
Paul J
We are currently sending out some HTML emails (via a programmatic
tool) to members of our company who use Outlook 2000 -2004. These
emails use inline style definitions (i.e. defined in the header) that
are applied throughout the email (i.e. to table cells, paragraphs,
etc.).
The problem is: The styles seem to come through fine when the user
first receives the email, but when a user replies or forwards the
email, the outlook/word editor seems to generate its own
interpretation of those styles which ends up being very different from
how they orginally looked.
I've seen other HTML based emails use inline style definitions which
work fine on forwards / replies. Is there some way that we need to
apply these styles in the HTML to ensure that when outlook
interprets/changes them on a reply/forward that they don't change the
appearance of the email.
Thanks,
Paul J.
tool) to members of our company who use Outlook 2000 -2004. These
emails use inline style definitions (i.e. defined in the header) that
are applied throughout the email (i.e. to table cells, paragraphs,
etc.).
The problem is: The styles seem to come through fine when the user
first receives the email, but when a user replies or forwards the
email, the outlook/word editor seems to generate its own
interpretation of those styles which ends up being very different from
how they orginally looked.
I've seen other HTML based emails use inline style definitions which
work fine on forwards / replies. Is there some way that we need to
apply these styles in the HTML to ensure that when outlook
interprets/changes them on a reply/forward that they don't change the
appearance of the email.
Thanks,
Paul J.