She can't upgrade to 2003 as her OS does not qualify.
Also, the Outlook News Reader is really a stub of Outlook Express. Outlook
does not have its own built-in news reader and has always used Outlook
Express.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.
After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, clintonG asked:
| OutLook is way 'better' than OutLook Express. It has many,
| many more features that make using the software easier to use,
| more powerful to use, and most importantly, much safer to use.
|
| IMO the only thing OE should be used for is with newsgroups and
| even OutLook itself can be used with newsgroups -- and also with
| RSS news readers I might add -- so there is no rational need to
| not use OutLook other than ignorance.
|
| Install OutLook 2003 if you can or at the very least OutLook 2000
| which is less beneficial than OutLook 2003 but still better than OE.
|
| The problem with installing OutLook 2000 at this point is finding all
| of the add-ins and patches that are now easy to do with 2003 as it
| is the current release.
|
| I would also suggest upgrading to XP if you can manage to do so
| as ME is really out of the loop these days. The most experienced
| will do a clean install to a new or freshly formatted hard drive.
|
| So, your friend was right and so am I.
|
|
| || Is Outlook better than Outlook Express ?
||
|| A friend told me the above.
||
|| If I were to switch from OE to Outlook, how can I import all my
|| emails etc. from OE to Outlook ?
||
|| Can anyone pls. help me.
||
|| I have a Windows ME machine
|| I am NOT TECHNICAL so pls. explain in detail.
||
|| Thanks
|| Lynn