Hi, Rico.
Currently i am not running a split database system,
mainly because, users do not need thier own versions of the forms
If these are bound forms, then the users should have their own copy,
especially if there are Memo/OLE data type fields that the form is bound to.
An interrupted "write to disk" operation is what usually causes corruption,
and multiple users sharing bound forms are known to bring higher risk of
these errors.
One can automate the distribution of the front end with Tony Toews's (MVP)
AutoFE utililty. With this utility, the developer places the new front end
on the server and the next time the users open the application, the new
front end is saved to their hard drives and they start using it. Please see
the following Web page for more information on his utility:
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/autofe.htm
and the fact that i haven't had any problems so far.
Famous last words. ;-) There's no guarantee that this will remain the
case. Most work places want to minimize the down time for database
applications, so the first recommendation for multiuser databases is to
split the database as a precaution against the likelihood of corruption.
For more information, please see the tip on split databases on the following
Web page:
http://www.Access.QBuilt.com/html/gem_tips.html#SplitDB
what are the advantages and what
problems am i likely to run into if i dont split.
Besides what's discussed in the tip listed above, I'll add that you've been
lucky so far that you haven't had any problems. The Microsoft Access team
has admitted that the number one cause of curruption is the sharing of
multiuser databases.
HTH.
Gunny
See
http://www.QBuilt.com for all your database needs.
See
http://www.Access.QBuilt.com for Microsoft Access tips.