Listed attachments not printing

[StainlessSteelRat]

Hi folks,

Using Outlook 2003 on XP.

On one system if I print an HTML email with attachments, the list of
attachments appears on the printed email.

On another system, if I do the same thing the email prints, but without any
reference to the attachments.

Any ideas why?

Thanks

--
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

"Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas. Whatever."
-- Rimmer, Red Dwarf

 

[Diane Poremsky [MVP]]

Are both systems at the same update level?

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]



Outlook Tips by email:
(e-mail address removed)

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
(e-mail address removed)

You can access this newsgroup by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx or point your
newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com.

 

[StainlessSteelRat]

Are both systems at the same update level?

Good question. I'll double check. Thanks for the reply!

--
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

"Give a man health and a course to steer, and he'll never stop to
trouble about whether he's happy or not." -- George Bernard Shaw

 

[Lizzy]

I am having the same problem since we updated our computer. All information
is updated to the way it was before, but now I can't print the list of
attachments. Does anyone have a solution to this?

 

[StainlessSteelRat]

I am having the same problem since we updated our computer. All
information is updated to the way it was before, but now I can't
print the list of attachments. Does anyone have a solution to this?

Thanks to Diane's advice I installed SP3 for Office 2003, and it fixed the
problem.

Not sure if that helps?

--
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

Dewey: She's stealing Christmas!
Malcolm: Mom, you can't do this!
Reese: Yeah, this is the last year Dewey'll believe in Santa Claus.
Dewey: What?!

 

[Lizzy]

Got it. SP3 got it to finally work again. Thanks for the update! Hope
your's works now too

 

[Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]]

StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

I have a feeling Harry Harrison would have a problem with you using his
copyrighted character name. The fact that you seem to be declaring a
copyright for the name "Stainless Steel Rat" at the bottom of your web page
is just screaming "sue me." I wonder what Ace books, Doubleday (Random
House), Pyramid, or one of the other publishers would say.

 

[StainlessSteelRat]

I have a feeling Harry Harrison would have a problem with you using
his copyrighted character name. The fact that you seem to be
declaring a copyright for the name "Stainless Steel Rat" at the
bottom of your web page is just screaming "sue me." I wonder what
Ace books, Doubleday (Random House), Pyramid, or one of the other
publishers would say.

It must have been added somewhat unwittingly by the guy that designed the
site, but if anything's copyright it's just the content, not the name.
Seeing as the site points to and praises Harry Harrison's site, and I'm a
huge fan of the books, I doubt he's going to get upset about it. Unless he's
as uptight as you are?

--
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

"How did I end up like this? On a ship where the fourth most popular
pastime is going down to the laundry room and watching my knickers
spin dry?" -- Kochanski, Red Dwarf

 

[Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]]

Seeing as the site points to and praises Harry Harrison's site, and I'm a
huge fan of the books, I doubt he's going to get upset about it. Unless
he's as uptight as you are?

Well, it seems he may have moved to Russia because he felt they were less
oppressive than the US, so perhaps he won't care. Nonetheless, you have an
obligation to ask his permission before using copyrighted material. It's
not a matter of being "uptight", it's a matter of being legal and moral.

 

[StainlessSteelRat]

Well, it seems he may have moved to Russia because he felt they were
less oppressive than the US, so perhaps he won't care. Nonetheless,
you have an obligation to ask his permission before using copyrighted
material. It's not a matter of being "uptight", it's a matter of
being legal and moral.

I say it's still a matter of being uptight.

From a moral perspective, my site's homepage clearly states it's a homage to
the series of books, and links to HH's site, praising the books. I don't
feel there's anything poor morally about that. Along with the other millions
of fan sites out there.

From a legal perspective, the site designer may have made a faux pas using
the name in context with copyright, but the few paragraphs of introductory
text would be covered under fair use.

As already mentioned, I doubt HH will get unhappy about that, and neither HH
or his publishers have in 6-7 years of the site's existence. In fact you're
the only person to have even mentioned it in that entire time, as all others
have either stated their love of the books as well, or been intrigued enough
to read them.

--
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

"For the last six years I've only thought about two things... what Sean
would look like if he were alive today, and what I would do to the man
who took him if I ever found him. You were right... I am going to kill
this man." -- John Anderton, Minority Report