R
Rob B.
Is there a prevailing wisdom on whether or not tables with many fields
should be split into 2 or more separate tables? I have a situation with one
table, Table_1, that it seemed to make sense to split because it had so many
fields AND some data, Table_2, does not need to be maintained indefinitely.
The initial data entry requires information be stored in both tables and
synchronized with each other in a 1-to-1 relationship. After a period of
time, Table_2 data has served its purpose and is no longer needed. It is my
preference to delete the Table_2 record once the data has served its
purpose. So much for the 1-to-1.
If I stored ALL the fields only in Table_1, it seems rather clumsy as even
if I went back and deleted the time sensitive data, I would have a bunch of
unused fields. With two tables, I am concerned about the design being
equally clumsy.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this.
Rob B.
should be split into 2 or more separate tables? I have a situation with one
table, Table_1, that it seemed to make sense to split because it had so many
fields AND some data, Table_2, does not need to be maintained indefinitely.
The initial data entry requires information be stored in both tables and
synchronized with each other in a 1-to-1 relationship. After a period of
time, Table_2 data has served its purpose and is no longer needed. It is my
preference to delete the Table_2 record once the data has served its
purpose. So much for the 1-to-1.
If I stored ALL the fields only in Table_1, it seems rather clumsy as even
if I went back and deleted the time sensitive data, I would have a bunch of
unused fields. With two tables, I am concerned about the design being
equally clumsy.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this.
Rob B.