L
leon
How to annoy multiple users in one go!
Setup:
Exchange server 2003; Outlook 2000
User A sends a meeting request to User B but also includes Receptionst
C so she can book the room.
Meeting request goes successfully to User B and receptionist C, but a
second meeting request also mysteriously gets sent to a distribution
group for all staff in the office.
If the meeting request is sent without including Receptionist C it
works as it should. The distribution group does not receive the
request.
There are no rules set on the receptionist's Outlook client.
This has happened 3 times for requests from different originators. The
one common thing being receptionist C being included in the original
request.
Tracking the request in ESM shows 2 requests. The first going to the
correct recipients, and a second at the same time going to the
Distribution Group.
This second mail shows the correct originator. if it had been a server
rule along the lines of 'forward all mails to receptionistname to
distribution groupname, i would expect tracking to show the originator
of the second request to be receptionistname. But it isn't
Users on the distribution group on opening the request are shown
'please respond on behalf of Receptionistname'.
???
Any ideas?
Len
Setup:
Exchange server 2003; Outlook 2000
User A sends a meeting request to User B but also includes Receptionst
C so she can book the room.
Meeting request goes successfully to User B and receptionist C, but a
second meeting request also mysteriously gets sent to a distribution
group for all staff in the office.
If the meeting request is sent without including Receptionist C it
works as it should. The distribution group does not receive the
request.
There are no rules set on the receptionist's Outlook client.
This has happened 3 times for requests from different originators. The
one common thing being receptionist C being included in the original
request.
Tracking the request in ESM shows 2 requests. The first going to the
correct recipients, and a second at the same time going to the
Distribution Group.
This second mail shows the correct originator. if it had been a server
rule along the lines of 'forward all mails to receptionistname to
distribution groupname, i would expect tracking to show the originator
of the second request to be receptionistname. But it isn't
Users on the distribution group on opening the request are shown
'please respond on behalf of Receptionistname'.
???
Any ideas?
Len