L
Les Isaacs
Bob
OK - the penny has dropped: I now understand that your method works by
formatting an invalid postcodes in a way that differentiates them from valid
postcodes. Sorry I was a bit slow to see this!
I have opened your example in excel (thanks for the suggestion Peo!), and I
can see your method working ... except that it does seem to allow some
invalid postcodes (e.g. CH47 54R, and CFR 7BT). I have tried looking at the
list of defined names to see if I can work out how to amend them to correct
these problems, but I'm afraid the code is beyond me (but I hope you'll
agree that I've come a long way from when I was reluctant to even try using
your code!).
The other issue here is that I have also been trying to implement an
alternative solution, from Nick Rothstein in this thread, which looks like
it will work through data validation and so would in fact be preferable (as
it would prevent invalids rather than highlighting them). So although I am
certainly very grateful to you for all your help with this I think that
perhaps I will now run with Rick's solution: I hope you are not offended!
In case you are interested (as I certainly still am) in why your method
isn't working in my workbook I am emailing it to you seperately.
Many thanks once again.
Les
OK - the penny has dropped: I now understand that your method works by
formatting an invalid postcodes in a way that differentiates them from valid
postcodes. Sorry I was a bit slow to see this!
I have opened your example in excel (thanks for the suggestion Peo!), and I
can see your method working ... except that it does seem to allow some
invalid postcodes (e.g. CH47 54R, and CFR 7BT). I have tried looking at the
list of defined names to see if I can work out how to amend them to correct
these problems, but I'm afraid the code is beyond me (but I hope you'll
agree that I've come a long way from when I was reluctant to even try using
your code!).
The other issue here is that I have also been trying to implement an
alternative solution, from Nick Rothstein in this thread, which looks like
it will work through data validation and so would in fact be preferable (as
it would prevent invalids rather than highlighting them). So although I am
certainly very grateful to you for all your help with this I think that
perhaps I will now run with Rick's solution: I hope you are not offended!
In case you are interested (as I certainly still am) in why your method
isn't working in my workbook I am emailing it to you seperately.
Many thanks once again.
Les