Performance Problems with Access 95

A

Andreas

when i run an access 95 application on windows XP SP2 the perfomance goes
dramatically down. I don't face such problems on other windows (98, 2000 etc)
Any suggestions????
 
A

Andreas

well, as i know access 95 runs only on systems with maximum 512 MB memory...
to increase the memory will not help at all...
do you have any other suggestions?
thanks...
 
A

aaron.kempf

yeah

USE A CURRENT VERSION OF ACCESS!!

it's not secure to use shit that is 10 years out of date.
 
T

Tony Toews

Andreas said:
well, as i know access 95 runs only on systems with maximum 512 MB memory...
to increase the memory will not help at all...
do you have any other suggestions?
Click to expand...

Yes, but you won't appreciate my suggestion. Upgrade to Access 97 at
least.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
 
A

Arvin Meyer [MVP]

I have to agree with Tony. The 2 worst versions, stability-wise, are Access
95 and Access 2000. It's a toss-up which I hated the most. The instability
mostly manifested itself during development. Once the application was
finished, I didn't have too many problems.
--
Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP
Microsoft Access
Free Access downloads
http://www.datastrat.com
http://www.mvps.org/access
 
A

aaron.kempf

i hate 2000 the most..

i mean.. SQL 2000 and Access 2000 don't play nice without a special
patch.. i mean-- who was the PM that came up with that idea?

-aaron
 
Top