Why is Outlook not the limiting factor? For years I have been waiting for
Outlook to have a "CC... (w/o attachment)" function to mimic what hardcopy
letters have used for years. Seems like it would help reduce the glut of
e-mail traffic, and would let others know you have forwarded the attachment.
Is it because it would be too difficult interfacing older versions of outlook
with a newer version having this capability? Seems like in its simplest
implementation, for anyone identified as CC...(w/o Attachments), it could
just strip off the attachments and insert a phrase like "[Carbon Copy
Recipient w/o attachment(s)] " before the body of the e-mail.
Roady said:
Outlook is not the limiting factor here. Automatic or not; there always have
to be generated 2 separate emails with different header information.
-----
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
It is not possible in Outlook without sending 2 separate emails, one with
and one without the attachment.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Donna Casteel asked:
| I would like to send a message with an attachment.
|
| However I want the attachment to go only to those in the TO line and
| not to those in the CC line.
|
| Anyone know how to do this?
|
| Thanks