rejected mail

P

PacificStarfish

I use Outlook 2000. Since my sister changed her e-mail address, she can
receive mail from me, but when she tries to "reply" or send a new message,
her mail to me is rejected.
"Reason: Server rejected MAIL FROM address.
Diagnostic code: smtp;550-66.82.4.90 blocked by
blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.net. B
Remote system: dns;gateway1.worldnet.att.net
(TCP|66.82.4.90|50970|204.127.134.23|25)
(worldnet.att.net - Maillennium ESMTP/MULTIBOX
mtiwmxc12 #1195)"
She doesn't have trouble mailing me from her business address.
 
J

John Vinson

I use Outlook 2000. Since my sister changed her e-mail address, she can
receive mail from me, but when she tries to "reply" or send a new message,
her mail to me is rejected.

Please post your question in an Outlook newsgroup (scroll down the
list of newsgroups on the left side of the screen). This newsgroup is
for a different program, Microsoft Access.

John W. Vinson[MVP]
 
D

Dirk Goldgar

PacificStarfish said:
I use Outlook 2000. Since my sister changed her e-mail address, she
can receive mail from me, but when she tries to "reply" or send a new
message, her mail to me is rejected.
"Reason: Server rejected MAIL FROM address.
Diagnostic code: smtp;550-66.82.4.90 blocked by
blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.net. B
Remote system: dns;gateway1.worldnet.att.net
(TCP|66.82.4.90|50970|204.127.134.23|25)
(worldnet.att.net - Maillennium ESMTP/MULTIBOX
mtiwmxc12 #1195)"
She doesn't have trouble mailing me from her business address.

It sounds like your ISP has black-listed the mail server from which your
sister is sending her mail. That would most likely be because of an
excess of spam received from that server. You should take the matter up
with your ISP.

But this is not the right place to be posting questions about mail
service or Outlook (not that it's really an Outlook issue, anyway).
This newsgroup is devoted to discussion of general matters pertaining to
Microsoft Access, the database program. It's not for "public access to
Microsoft", though its name may be misleading.
 
Top