Thanks Doug. I thought I had seen such a warning before, but I wasn't sure where I had come
across it.
Tom
_________________________________
I don't have my list of common responses here at work, so I can't find it,
but yes, unnecessary repairs in Access 97 can lead to corruption.
While it doesn't specifically mention corruption,
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=279334 explicitly states "IMPORTANT: Run
the Repair Database command only when the Microsoft Jet database engine
returns an error message indicating that the Repair should be run. The
Repair Database command should not be run under any other circumstances."
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
(No private e-mails, please)
_________________________________
Hi Jerry,
I think I remember hearing that doing unnecessary repair operations in Access 95 could cause
problems. I don't know if the same applies to Access 97 as well. I guess you can apply the old
axiom "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
Starting with JET 3.6, the repair functionality has been combined with compact. Thus, one
performs a "compact and repair" in one procedure when using Access 2000/2002/2003. This should be
done on a regular basis.
Tom
________________________________
Hi everyone,
Should repairing an Access 97 database be done only sparingly, or can it be done often, even if
no specific problem is detected?
Would the response to this question only apply to Access 97 files, or later versions as well?
Thanks.