Regis said:
Sorry John. My fault. I took for asset that everyone is doing a project by
phases/deliverables. Sorry.
Our current project is ended and is build using the phase/deliverables
approach e.g.
Definition
Define the central report X
Realization
Build the central report X
...
For the post-mortem, I want to shown a reports reversing the
phase/deliverables and provide the total cost of a deliverables across all
the phases.
Again, sorry for the confusion.
Regis,
Apparently we are still on different pages. In my experience a normal
project structure is arranged in a logical sequence of performance
tasks. Defined groups of tasks may be phase based, function based, or
performing org based. At the end of each phase there is often a
"deliverable" to the next phase or organization. Using this structure,
cost summaries for each phase, function or org falls out automatically
by the indenture structure of the plan.
Now, if I stretch your structure out as I would see it, Definition is
the first phase. Under it are several performance tasks that result in
the definition of the central report (i.e. first deliverable). That
deliverable is then used by phase 2 which is "realization". Under that
are several more performance tasks that end with the build of the
central report (i.e. second deliverable). And so on. As I said before,
this structure will automatically give cost breakdown by each phase.
If this doesn't help, I'm afraid you are going to have to give a whole
lot more detail before I can suggest an approach. Or, perhaps someone
else understands what you want and can jump in with a suggestion.
John
Project MVP