We're *not* talking about degree of hitting, but simply the concept of
physical punishment ... right Bob?
You must have been a very well behaved child then.
I *know* I wouldn't be where I am today (some may make jokes about that), if
it weren't for the discipline invoked upon me by my parents, which *did*
include a whack or two at the proper time and place!
I agree that not *every* child should automatically be exposed to this type
of penalty, but there are individuals in this world (child as well as
adult), where no other form of correction, other then chastisement will
obtain any lasting results.
And ... there are individuals where *nothing* will bring them into the
accepted mainstream of human behavior and conduct.
Do you *realize* that there are 10 and 12 year olds that shoot people? ...
On a regular basis!
How did they get that way?
Not just the abundance of firearms.
There are *MORE* stabbings and slashings then shootings.
That child didn't suddenly change to a societal misfit on his 10th birthday!
There were years involved in the forming of this (mis)behavior.
--
Regards,
RD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please keep all correspondence within the NewsGroup, so all may benefit !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Phillips said:
Smacking a child should be illegal, of any age.