Hi Rick,
I completely agree with you, although I'd boost that user base to 15~20
users, minimum. Armen Stein, the past President of the Access User Group that
I am a member of, and the owner of J Street Technology (database consulting
business), shared some advice with our group on this subject. He told our
group that he usually always advises his clients to purchase Access, because
the extra costs involved in dealing with runtime related issues that he would
have to charge will easily pay for copies of Access for each user, when you
are dealing with a small number of users.
Tom
http://www.access.qbuilt.com/html/expert_contributors.html
http://www.access.qbuilt.com/html/search.html
__________________________________________
:
Hi all,
I need to roll out an application that uses Ms Access. The users do
not have Access Instakked. They do hav Ms Office 2003 Standard.
Do I need to install any runtime modules for Access?
Thanks,
Martin
Yes, they will need either a full (licensed) version of Access or you will
have
to purchase the appropriate packages and tools so that you can distribute
with
the Access runtime.
If you have no experience with it you should know that an Access app that is
expected to run in the runtime environment needs to be considerably more
"polished" than one that is run in the full Access envioronment. There is no
access to the db window, you have to provide all custom menus and toolbars,
you
must have very robust error handling, and there are a few features that the
runtime doesn't support at all (like filter-by-form).
Because of the time and effort necessary for the above (if your app doesn't
already meet those criteria) using the runtime is not really financially
worthwhile unless you have at least half a dozen or more users, If less than
that I would just install full blown Access on their PCs instead.