R
Rick
We presently have a DB residing on our LAN server and are
considering splitting it to permit modifications to the
front-end without booting everyone out of program. I'm
not sure that I totally understand the concept of
splitting the DB and have a few questions:
1. The present thought is to split the DB leaving the
front-end in the directory on the server where it
presently resides and to place the backend (tables) in
another directory on the same server. I know this will
not reduce network traffic. However; it will a least
keep the front-end on the server and any modifications
done will be available realtime to several users. Is this
a practical option or does one have to place a front-end
on 35 PC's and find a method of updating them all with
the latest changes made to the front-end from time to
time?
2. We have full security on the existing DB and wonder
if there are any negative consequences of splitting the
DB at this time?
TIA
considering splitting it to permit modifications to the
front-end without booting everyone out of program. I'm
not sure that I totally understand the concept of
splitting the DB and have a few questions:
1. The present thought is to split the DB leaving the
front-end in the directory on the server where it
presently resides and to place the backend (tables) in
another directory on the same server. I know this will
not reduce network traffic. However; it will a least
keep the front-end on the server and any modifications
done will be available realtime to several users. Is this
a practical option or does one have to place a front-end
on 35 PC's and find a method of updating them all with
the latest changes made to the front-end from time to
time?
2. We have full security on the existing DB and wonder
if there are any negative consequences of splitting the
DB at this time?
TIA