T
Tom Richardson
My worksheet has values 1:4 in cells A1:A4, respectively.
The formula SUMPRODUCT(OFFSET(A1,0,0,3,1),OFFSET(A1,1,0,3,1)) gives the
correct result, 20.
The formula SUMPRODUCT(INDEX(A1:A5,{2;3;4},1),INDEX(A1:A5,{1;2;3},1)),
entered in a single cell, gives the incorrect result, 2.
The formula SUMPRODUCT(INDEX(A1:A5,{2;3;4},1),INDEX(A1:A5,{1;2;3},1)),
entered as an array formula in a range of at least two cells, gives the
correct result, 20, in each cell.
My suggestion is to fix this bug.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...f10f65d&dg=microsoft.public.excel.crashesgpfs
The formula SUMPRODUCT(OFFSET(A1,0,0,3,1),OFFSET(A1,1,0,3,1)) gives the
correct result, 20.
The formula SUMPRODUCT(INDEX(A1:A5,{2;3;4},1),INDEX(A1:A5,{1;2;3},1)),
entered in a single cell, gives the incorrect result, 2.
The formula SUMPRODUCT(INDEX(A1:A5,{2;3;4},1),INDEX(A1:A5,{1;2;3},1)),
entered as an array formula in a range of at least two cells, gives the
correct result, 20, in each cell.
My suggestion is to fix this bug.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...f10f65d&dg=microsoft.public.excel.crashesgpfs