A
AndrewP
MS-Project 2007, Project Web Access:
I understand from another posting, and from trying things out myself,
that the 2007 "My timesheet" view is very inflexible. I would like to
do the following, mainly to save screen space and make it easier for
my users:
1. Remove the "planned" rows - they just take up screen space, and we
would rather people thought about what they had actually done than
take the easy route of pretending they have done what was planned.
2. (Configurably) remove the "Billing Category" column, as we use
"standard" all the time.
3. (Configurably) remove the "comment" column - we don't use it. I
prefer to get people to talk to each other, and at present we are all
co-located.
4. (Configurably) remove the "approval status" column.
If you know how to configure the above, then great - please let me
know.
If you work for a software house, then I suggest that there could be a
market for add-ons to do the above. It's probably not worth our while
to pay for one-off development, but we could find a budget for some
(reasonably priced) add-ons. If they were from a reputable
organisation then "shrink-wrapped", but if from an independent
software developer, we would be interested, but would probably need
source code as assurance.
Thanks & regards.
I understand from another posting, and from trying things out myself,
that the 2007 "My timesheet" view is very inflexible. I would like to
do the following, mainly to save screen space and make it easier for
my users:
1. Remove the "planned" rows - they just take up screen space, and we
would rather people thought about what they had actually done than
take the easy route of pretending they have done what was planned.
2. (Configurably) remove the "Billing Category" column, as we use
"standard" all the time.
3. (Configurably) remove the "comment" column - we don't use it. I
prefer to get people to talk to each other, and at present we are all
co-located.
4. (Configurably) remove the "approval status" column.
If you know how to configure the above, then great - please let me
know.
If you work for a software house, then I suggest that there could be a
market for add-ons to do the above. It's probably not worth our while
to pay for one-off development, but we could find a budget for some
(reasonably priced) add-ons. If they were from a reputable
organisation then "shrink-wrapped", but if from an independent
software developer, we would be interested, but would probably need
source code as assurance.
Thanks & regards.