8
85ascMcLaren
Since I am using disconnected recordsets in ADO, do you see any point for me
to also put a transacation around it? I am viewing my disconnected
recordsets as a sort of transaction where if there is an error on the update,
I just don't connect the local recordset back to the actual database
connection to write the actual changes..
Any thought on my opinion or logic behind my thinking ?
to also put a transacation around it? I am viewing my disconnected
recordsets as a sort of transaction where if there is an error on the update,
I just don't connect the local recordset back to the actual database
connection to write the actual changes..
Any thought on my opinion or logic behind my thinking ?