...
...
I'm curious. If dates were not recognized as such, how many people,
including yourself, would criticize MS for *that*?
Who the heck says I would, you @#$% @#$@#$%!$%?
I suppose you're one of the unimaginitive types who prefer one and only rigidly
enforced way of doing anything, and you can't conceive of the possibility that
there might be times when you'd want Excel to accept
2003-12-31
as text just like Excel has no problem whatsoever accepting
2003-99-31
as text. Note: this is on a system in which the systemwide default short and
long date formats are mm/dd/yyyy and mmmm d, yyyy. It's one thing for Excel to
convert entries in these formats into date serial numbers automatically. It's a
major PITA for excel to convert any other entries automatically.
It's also the lack of any way to *DISABLE* (and subsequently re-enable) this
feature that's the problem (along with putatively knowledgeable users who are so
obtuse as to fail to understand that this could be a problem).