K
K. Georgiadis
I posted this before and, since I am completely
mystified, I am posting again:
"I have three worksheets of identical layout (and in the
same workbook), the 3rd sheet being the where I aggregate
the numbers of the previous two. I am mystified by the
fact that the cell in the same position in sheet one is
assumed to be a relative reference (e.g., Sheet1!B24)
whereas cell B24 in the second sheet is automatically
assumed to be an absolute reference (e.g., Sheet2!$B$24.
Any ideas why this happens?"
I don't see a pattern in Excel's assumption that the cell
reference should be absolute, whereas in seemingly
identical instances it assumes that it is relative. In
several instances, I ended up copying an erroneous
formula across columns because I didn't notice that Excel
was automatically assuming an absolute cell reference.
I'm on the alert now but curious why and when it happens
mystified, I am posting again:
"I have three worksheets of identical layout (and in the
same workbook), the 3rd sheet being the where I aggregate
the numbers of the previous two. I am mystified by the
fact that the cell in the same position in sheet one is
assumed to be a relative reference (e.g., Sheet1!B24)
whereas cell B24 in the second sheet is automatically
assumed to be an absolute reference (e.g., Sheet2!$B$24.
Any ideas why this happens?"
I don't see a pattern in Excel's assumption that the cell
reference should be absolute, whereas in seemingly
identical instances it assumes that it is relative. In
several instances, I ended up copying an erroneous
formula across columns because I didn't notice that Excel
was automatically assuming an absolute cell reference.
I'm on the alert now but curious why and when it happens