FlashPaper vs. PDF

[BQ]

Does anyone have an opinion, pro or con on adding Macromedia FlashPaper2
documents on website instead of PDF files?

One big positive in FlashPaper2 is that people would "not" need to have a
"viewer" loaded on there PC, like they have to with PDF.

FlashPaper2 would load quicker because a viewer doesn't have to be loaded.

It may appear more professional to open a FlashPaper2 document instead of
having an "Adobe Advertised" viewer displayed while viewer is loading.

But then, the nice thing about PDF files is that they can be easily
downloaded and shared with others (e-mailed) because they "automatically"
open in Adobe Acrobat.

I guess my opinion is that FlashPaper2 on websites would be a good
alternative to PDF if the document is "for viewing only".

Anyone else????

 

[clintonG]

Some interesting comments regarding FlashPaper can be
read here http://www.actionscript.com/flashweek/00000537.html

 

[Murray]

Bad link for me - you sure it's right?

 

[clintonG]

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again.

 

[Murray]

I did. It worked good! 8)

--
Murray

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again.

--
<%= Clinton Gallagher, "Twice the Results -- Half the Cost"
Architectural & e-Business Consulting -- Software Development
NET (e-mail address removed)
URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/