Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure

  • Thread starter marvin Villatoro
  • Start date
R

r3piphany

This is for Millie and Joanne, the self-proclaiming MVPs. Like hundreds
or thousands (try looking up the error message and see how many people
are running into this problem) of others, I came here looking for
possible fixes, known issues, or potentially useful suggestions.
Instead we get you geniuses looking down your noses at everyone about a
problem you're not qualified to address (but that doesn't keep you from
acting like you're somehow indignant with all us little-people and our
petty complaints--you probably don't search forums when you run into
problems).
We don't need some half-wit(s) who haven't run into this issue to
explain that it's not supported by Microsoft (notice we're at a NON-MS
forum?).

If you don't have an answer why not save your insight (or lack thereof)
for some other issue?
Your arrogance comes across as purely as your ignorance, you obviously
don't know how to help these people. I suppose if you have a problem
with software you probably just decompile it and locate the bug
yourself, right? or, considering your obvious importance, your contacts
at MS probably just send you the source code to figure it out for them.

and oh gee, let's make sure we don't send millie any email to her
personal account, she might delete it without reading it, then what
will we all do?

and joanne, that isn't a bad idea you had... however no one cares if
you read it, we only care that for no reason you want to comment on it.
Must be the "well I didn't have a problem installing it--therefore all
these people must be idiots" attitude you probably have trouble with in
the workplace.
If you installed it with no problem, then why comment on it except some
pathetic attempt at making yourself feel superior? Invest some time in
self-evaluation and make the world a better place.

----------------------

Now for everyone else except those two "MVP"s... I've installed this on
two machines with no problems, put another hard drive into one of the
machines with a fresh install of XP pro, used the same downloaded
software that worked before, and got the error everyone else who would
come here looking for possible answers is getting.
I've checked about 20 forums with people running into the same thing,
and no answers yet. I only registered here to post my disgust with
those two arrogant rejects.
Hopefully someone aside from people who've never seen this error before
will make their way around with some insight that would be useful.
 
R

r3piphany

This is for Millie and Joanne, the self-proclaiming MVPs. Like hundreds
or thousands (try looking up the error message and see how many people
are running into this problem) of others, I came here looking for
possible fixes, known issues, or potentially useful suggestions.
Instead we get you geniuses looking down your noses at everyone about a
problem you're not qualified to address (but that doesn't keep you from
acting like you're somehow indignant with all us little-people and our
petty complaints--you probably don't search forums when you run into
problems).
We don't need some half-wit(s) who haven't run into this issue to
explain that it's not supported by Microsoft (notice we're at a NON-MS
forum?).

If you don't have an answer why not save your insight (or lack thereof)
for some other issue?
Your arrogance comes across as purely as your ignorance, you obviously
don't know how to help these people. I suppose if you have a problem
with software you probably just decompile it and locate the bug
yourself, right? or, considering your obvious importance, your contacts
at MS probably just send you the source code to figure it out for them.

and oh gee, let's make sure we don't send millie any email to her
personal account, she might delete it without reading it, then what
will we all do?

and joanne, that isn't a bad idea you had... however no one cares if
you read it, we only care that for no reason you want to comment on it.
Must be the "well I didn't have a problem installing it--therefore all
these people must be idiots" attitude you probably have trouble with in
the workplace.
If you installed it with no problem, then why comment on it except some
pathetic attempt at making yourself feel superior? Invest some time in
self-evaluation and make the world a better place.

----------------------

Now for everyone else except those two "MVP"s... I've installed this on
two machines with no problems, put another hard drive into one of the
machines with a fresh install of XP pro, used the same downloaded
software that worked before, and got the error everyone else who would
come here looking for possible answers is getting.
I've checked about 20 forums with people running into the same thing,
and no answers yet. I only registered here to post my disgust with
those two arrogant rejects.
Hopefully someone aside from people who've never seen this error before
will make their way around with some insight that would be useful.
 
R

r3piphany

This is for Millie and Joanne, the self-proclaiming MVPs. Like hundreds
or thousands (try looking up the error message and see how many people
are running into this problem) of others, I came here looking for
possible fixes, known issues, or potentially useful suggestions.
Instead we get you geniuses looking down your noses at everyone about a
problem you're not qualified to address (but that doesn't keep you from
acting like you're somehow indignant with all us little-people and our
petty complaints--you probably don't search forums when you run into
problems).
We don't need some half-wit(s) who haven't run into this issue to
explain that it's not supported by Microsoft (notice we're at a NON-MS
forum?).

If you don't have an answer why not save your insight (or lack thereof)
for some other issue?
Your arrogance comes across as purely as your ignorance, you obviously
don't know how to help these people. I suppose if you have a problem
with software you probably just decompile it and locate the bug
yourself, right? or, considering your obvious importance, your contacts
at MS probably just send you the source code to figure it out for them.

and oh gee, let's make sure we don't send millie any email to her
personal account, she might delete it without reading it, then what
will we all do?

and joanne, that isn't a bad idea you had... however no one cares if
you read it, we only care that for no reason you want to comment on it.
Must be the "well I didn't have a problem installing it--therefore all
these people must be idiots" attitude you probably have trouble with in
the workplace.
If you installed it with no problem, then why comment on it except some
pathetic attempt at making yourself feel superior? Invest some time in
self-evaluation and make the world a better place.

----------------------

Now for everyone else except those two "MVP"s... I've installed this on
two machines with no problems, put another hard drive into one of the
machines with a fresh install of XP pro, used the same downloaded
software that worked before, and got the error everyone else who would
come here looking for possible answers is getting.
I've checked about 20 forums with people running into the same thing,
and no answers yet. I only registered here to post my disgust with
those two arrogant rejects.
Hopefully someone aside from people who've never seen this error before
will make their way around with some insight that would be useful.
 
R

r3piphany

This is for Millie and Joanne, the self-proclaiming MVPs. Like hundreds
or thousands (try looking up the error message and see how many people
are running into this problem) of others, I came here looking for
possible fixes, known issues, or potentially useful suggestions.
Instead we get you geniuses looking down your noses at everyone about a
problem you're not qualified to address (but that doesn't keep you from
acting like you're somehow indignant with all us little-people and our
petty complaints--you probably don't search forums when you run into
problems).
We don't need some half-wit(s) who haven't run into this issue to
explain that it's not supported by Microsoft (notice we're at a NON-MS
forum?).

If you don't have an answer why not save your insight (or lack thereof)
for some other issue?
Your arrogance comes across as purely as your ignorance, you obviously
don't know how to help these people. I suppose if you have a problem
with software you probably just decompile it and locate the bug
yourself, right? or, considering your obvious importance, your contacts
at MS probably just send you the source code to figure it out for them.

and oh gee, let's make sure we don't send millie any email to her
personal account, she might delete it without reading it, then what
will we all do?

and joanne, that isn't a bad idea you had... however no one cares if
you read it, we only care that for no reason you want to comment on it.
Must be the "well I didn't have a problem installing it--therefore all
these people must be idiots" attitude you probably have trouble with in
the workplace.
If you installed it with no problem, then why comment on it except some
pathetic attempt at making yourself feel superior? Invest some time in
self-evaluation and make the world a better place.

----------------------

Now for everyone else except those two "MVP"s... I've installed this on
two machines with no problems, put another hard drive into one of the
machines with a fresh install of XP pro, used the same downloaded
software that worked before, and got the error everyone else who would
come here looking for possible answers is getting.
I've checked about 20 forums with people running into the same thing,
and no answers yet. I only registered here to post my disgust with
those two arrogant rejects.
Hopefully someone aside from people who've never seen this error before
will make their way around with some insight that would be useful.
 
R

r3piphany

This is for Millie and Joanne, the self-proclaiming MVPs. Like hundreds
or thousands (try looking up the error message and see how many people
are running into this problem) of others, I came here looking for
possible fixes, known issues, or potentially useful suggestions.
Instead we get you geniuses looking down your noses at everyone about a
problem you're not qualified to address (but that doesn't keep you from
acting like you're somehow indignant with all us little-people and our
petty complaints--you probably don't search forums when you run into
problems).
We don't need some half-wit(s) who haven't run into this issue to
explain that it's not supported by Microsoft (notice we're at a NON-MS
forum?).

If you don't have an answer why not save your insight (or lack thereof)
for some other issue?
Your arrogance comes across as purely as your ignorance, you obviously
don't know how to help these people. I suppose if you have a problem
with software you probably just decompile it and locate the bug
yourself, right? or, considering your obvious importance, your contacts
at MS probably just send you the source code to figure it out for them.

and oh gee, let's make sure we don't send millie any email to her
personal account, she might delete it without reading it, then what
will we all do?

and joanne, that isn't a bad idea you had... however no one cares if
you read it, we only care that for no reason you want to comment on it.
Must be the "well I didn't have a problem installing it--therefore all
these people must be idiots" attitude you probably have trouble with in
the workplace.
If you installed it with no problem, then why comment on it except some
pathetic attempt at making yourself feel superior? Invest some time in
self-evaluation and make the world a better place.

----------------------

Now for everyone else except those two "MVP"s... I've installed this on
two machines with no problems, put another hard drive into one of the
machines with a fresh install of XP pro, used the same downloaded
software that worked before, and got the error everyone else who would
come here looking for possible answers is getting.
I've checked about 20 forums with people running into the same thing,
and no answers yet. I only registered here to post my disgust with
those two arrogant rejects.
Hopefully someone aside from people who've never seen this error before
will make their way around with some insight that would be useful.
 
R

r3piphany

here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
http://forums.techarena.in/

I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
affiliated with MS.
You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).

Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I registered
to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
"Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
learn more about Windows XP."

Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
affiliated with MS?

If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
posting?
 
R

r3piphany

here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
http://forums.techarena.in/

I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
affiliated with MS.
You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).

Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I registered
to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
"Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
learn more about Windows XP."

Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
affiliated with MS?

If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
posting?
 
R

r3piphany

here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
http://forums.techarena.in/

I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
affiliated with MS.
You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).

Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I registered
to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
"Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
learn more about Windows XP."

Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
affiliated with MS?

If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
posting?
 
R

r3piphany

here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
http://forums.techarena.in/

I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
affiliated with MS.
You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).

Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I registered
to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
"Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
learn more about Windows XP."

Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
affiliated with MS?

If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
posting?
 
R

r3piphany

here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
http://forums.techarena.in/

I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
affiliated with MS.
You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).

Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I registered
to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
"Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
learn more about Windows XP."

Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
affiliated with MS?

If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
posting?
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Seems along with your arrogance, you have been duped as well:

From your internet headers:

From: r3piphany <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:33 +0530
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: Free Computer Help - http://forums.techarena.in
User-Agent: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Newsreader: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Originating-IP: 74.136.87.99
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.office.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: hostname.techarena.in 207.58.143.175
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.office.setup:108545

Seems that Techarena posts all of their questions here. So... who is the ID
10 T now?

As for the rest of your rant, whatever.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, r3piphany asked:

| here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
| http://forums.techarena.in/
|
| I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
| affiliated with MS.
| You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
| condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
| aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).
|
| Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I
| registered to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
| "Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
| questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
| learn more about Windows XP."
|
| Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
| twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
| affiliated with MS?
|
| If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
| posting?
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Seems along with your arrogance, you have been duped as well:

From your internet headers:

From: r3piphany <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:33 +0530
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: Free Computer Help - http://forums.techarena.in
User-Agent: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Newsreader: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Originating-IP: 74.136.87.99
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.office.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: hostname.techarena.in 207.58.143.175
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.office.setup:108545

Seems that Techarena posts all of their questions here. So... who is the ID
10 T now?

As for the rest of your rant, whatever.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, r3piphany asked:

| here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
| http://forums.techarena.in/
|
| I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
| affiliated with MS.
| You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
| condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
| aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).
|
| Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I
| registered to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
| "Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
| questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
| learn more about Windows XP."
|
| Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
| twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
| affiliated with MS?
|
| If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
| posting?
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Seems along with your arrogance, you have been duped as well:

From your internet headers:

From: r3piphany <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:33 +0530
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: Free Computer Help - http://forums.techarena.in
User-Agent: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Newsreader: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Originating-IP: 74.136.87.99
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.office.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: hostname.techarena.in 207.58.143.175
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.office.setup:108545

Seems that Techarena posts all of their questions here. So... who is the ID
10 T now?

As for the rest of your rant, whatever.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, r3piphany asked:

| here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
| http://forums.techarena.in/
|
| I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
| affiliated with MS.
| You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
| condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
| aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).
|
| Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I
| registered to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
| "Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
| questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
| learn more about Windows XP."
|
| Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
| twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
| affiliated with MS?
|
| If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
| posting?
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Seems along with your arrogance, you have been duped as well:

From your internet headers:

From: r3piphany <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:33 +0530
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: Free Computer Help - http://forums.techarena.in
User-Agent: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Newsreader: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Originating-IP: 74.136.87.99
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.office.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: hostname.techarena.in 207.58.143.175
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.office.setup:108545

Seems that Techarena posts all of their questions here. So... who is the ID
10 T now?

As for the rest of your rant, whatever.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, r3piphany asked:

| here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
| http://forums.techarena.in/
|
| I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
| affiliated with MS.
| You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
| condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
| aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).
|
| Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I
| registered to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
| "Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
| questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
| learn more about Windows XP."
|
| Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
| twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
| affiliated with MS?
|
| If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
| posting?
 
M

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Seems along with your arrogance, you have been duped as well:

From your internet headers:

From: r3piphany <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Office Professional Plus 2007 installation failure
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:33 +0530
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: Free Computer Help - http://forums.techarena.in
User-Agent: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Newsreader: vBulletin USENET gateway
X-Originating-IP: 74.136.87.99
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.office.setup
NNTP-Posting-Host: hostname.techarena.in 207.58.143.175
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.office.setup:108545

Seems that Techarena posts all of their questions here. So... who is the ID
10 T now?

As for the rest of your rant, whatever.


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, r3piphany asked:

| here's the address I'm at, copied from my browser address:
| http://forums.techarena.in/
|
| I don't see anything about this place being owned by or otherwise
| affiliated with MS.
| You've proved my point: you can't help but find a way to be
| condescending. It isn't supported by MS, and this isn't MS (and you
| aren't either, or are you saying you're a representative of MS?).
|
| Here's what MS site says if I do a search for the web site I
| registered to reply to your posts at (which is techarena):
| "Use these non-Microsoft communities online to get answers to your
| questions, state your opinions, meet other Windows XP enthusiasts, and
| learn more about Windows XP."
|
| Did you notice the "non-Microsoft" phrase there? Still going to try to
| twist yourself into being right by suggesting/implying this is
| affiliated with MS?
|
| If you don't have actual answers or helpful insight, why bother
| posting?
 
J

JoAnn Paules [MVP]

You noticed that too? :)

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]




"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
 
J

JoAnn Paules [MVP]

You noticed that too? :)

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]




"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
 
J

JoAnn Paules [MVP]

You noticed that too? :)

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]




"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
 
J

JoAnn Paules [MVP]

You noticed that too? :)

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]




"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
 
J

JoAnn Paules [MVP]

You noticed that too? :)

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]




"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top