M
Mark Davila
Hello All,
I'm using Word 2002. I have a 400 (and counting) page document and just
wanting to keep things manageable. Is it correct to say, as a general
proposition, that graphics formatted as in-line with text are preferrable
than floating? Seems to me that in-line are more "stable."
Anyway, how can I adjust the distance from text above and below for my
in-line graphic - as that option is greyed out when the picture is formatted
in-line with text. I notice that the distance from text above and below
feature is available for square and top and bottom formatting. Are those two
types of formatting the same as in-line? Should I just go ahead and format
the picture as square or top and bottom?
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Yours,
Mark Davila
I'm using Word 2002. I have a 400 (and counting) page document and just
wanting to keep things manageable. Is it correct to say, as a general
proposition, that graphics formatted as in-line with text are preferrable
than floating? Seems to me that in-line are more "stable."
Anyway, how can I adjust the distance from text above and below for my
in-line graphic - as that option is greyed out when the picture is formatted
in-line with text. I notice that the distance from text above and below
feature is available for square and top and bottom formatting. Are those two
types of formatting the same as in-line? Should I just go ahead and format
the picture as square or top and bottom?
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Yours,
Mark Davila