A
AkAlan via AccessMonster.com
I have several sql server databases that I have inherited and there are some
differences in how users access the server from how I had always done things
before. I had always had each user have a seperate login account and then
assign them to groups on the sql server. The way things are on my inherited
server is there are no individual logins rather the logins are Windows Active
Directory groups. Permissions are then based on those users. It really seems
like a slick way to do things, reducing a lot of time spent on redundancy but
is this going to give me any problems down the road? Is this a standard way
of doing things on networks that windows authenticate? Any thoughts on the
matter would be appreciated.
differences in how users access the server from how I had always done things
before. I had always had each user have a seperate login account and then
assign them to groups on the sql server. The way things are on my inherited
server is there are no individual logins rather the logins are Windows Active
Directory groups. Permissions are then based on those users. It really seems
like a slick way to do things, reducing a lot of time spent on redundancy but
is this going to give me any problems down the road? Is this a standard way
of doing things on networks that windows authenticate? Any thoughts on the
matter would be appreciated.